Genetics of Dwarfism in the Miniature Horse.
his is a transcript of the "ask the expert" Webinar sponsored and provided exclusively by Lil Beginnings on November 6th through the 30th of 2007 - Featuring John Eberth.
Note: This transcript is the property of Lil Beginnings and is not to be copied, edited, or distributed without written permission.
Please email me if you’d like to request permission to link to this article.
Dwarf Characteristics
Nov. 6 2007
Question
Have you found in your experience and research that a horse that has
produced a dwarf often has subtle dwarfish characteristics but in itself is
not considered a dwarf?
In other words, in hindsight, can you look at a mare or stallion and say, I am not surprised that this horse produced a dwarf.
On the other hand, have you seen a dwarf produced by a mare or stallion that totally shocks you as there is absolutely no evidence of dwarfism in either.
Thank you for your time and dedication on this matter.
Annette
HHP Miniature Shetlands & Training Center in eastern Washington State.
Answer:
Boy you picked a big one!
The short answer would yes and no. But I will give you the correct answer. (Deep Breath)
To answer fully your question, I need to take into account all 4 possible types I have characterized so far, however there could be more types than these or one of these types could be a combination of two of the four types. Please keep that in mind.
Unfortunately, I do not have my reference pictures on a website so I cannot show them here, and they need to stay off of websites for now, until I can definitively state such differences.
The carriers of types 1 and 4 SOMETIMES[u] show subtle features of a type 1 dwarf, i.e. extremely domed forehead, large prominant eyes, very exotic head overall. That being said however, it is NOT 100% true. In the carriers of types 1 and 4, height is extremely variable, bone structure and thickness extremely variable, length of neck extremely variable. I have samples of parents that produce a type 1 dwarf that really do not show signs in the head and are not very small in height, the only give away was pedigree. However other samples give all of the signs, head, off mouth (usually underbite), build, height, and pedigree.
To clarify 1 vs. 4, the type 1 is the type we see most often, the type 4 is the lethal type that does not go to term.
Carriers of types 2 and 3 so far have shown no signs of being carriers, all so far show extreme variation in height and conformation, the only commonality in structure of the parents so far are overall head structure. They are straight, slightly large for body size, very normal looking heads you would see on a regular horse and ARE NOT exotic. But, they are NOT a straight pony head, i.e. what most people refer to in the pony breed. These characteristics are very general visual differences and commonalities I have experienced and documented, and are not conformational facts describing the disease carriers. They are only observations so far that I see as commonalities with conditions producing a dwarf.
Type 2 dwarf is the type that looks like it has a normal body neck and a large plain or straight head, the dwarf just looks like it had it legs cut in half, in reality the upper leg bones are severely shortened, hips miss-shaped, and a large head. These are the bones and structures that I can tell so far are affected, though I do not have enough samples x-rayed and compared to make that definitive. Unfortunately, this is the type I have seen in the past most often used in breeding progams due to the fact that they still have a mostly normal life and reproductive viability.
Type 3 dwarf is the most severe type that is viable, they are extremely small usually, have severe spine (roachback) and leg deformities, usually severely shortened neck, and severely deformed head with off bite. This type is possibly a combination of types, i.e. inheritance of two different recessive dwarf genes due to the fact that the bodies are so severely deformed and variable it has been very difficult to find a consistent deformed type.
There are some concepts I need to explain about the inheritance and expression of recessive genes to qualify my answers. This is especially important involving carriers of recessive dwarf genes and other recessive deleterious genes, and determining, visually, carriers or non-carriers and the problems in doing only that.
One concept is PENETRANCE of a recessive gene over a dominant gene in a population. For example, how a recessive dwarf gene's characteristic can penetrate and express the condition over the dominant normal gene's characteristics over a large population. Visual example is a normal horse that is a recessive carrier of the type 1 dwarfism and shows some of the characteristics individually or in combinations, like a severely domed head, very large eyes, under bite, etc. The strict genetic definition is "the frequency, under given environmental conditions, with which a specific phenotype is expressed by those individuals with a specific genotype." So, you would see variable PENETRANCE of this recessive gene in the Miniature population, which is what I believe is occurring.
Another concept is EXPRESSIVITY of a recessive gene in one animal. The strict definition is the degree to which an expressed gene produces its effects in an organism. So, if you take the example of the situation I explained with Penetrance, you have a normal carrier of a type 1 recessive dwarf gene, and it shows some characteristics of possibly being a carrier, well EXPRESSIVITY is the how much effect is the dwarf gene having on the individual horse to overpower the dominant gene, i.e. slang terminology one might hear is "How dwarfy does the horse look?"
Now you also need to understand the difference of these terms and concepts regarding recessive genes when comparing them to co-dominant genes. A co-dominant diseased gene would ALWAYS be expressed in a carrier with its normal counterpart in equal amounts and NEVER be "hidden". A good example in some flowers is the color pink, it is not a one color but a combination of different colored cells, some are red and come are white, making the color look pink with the naked eye.
If this is a little confusing, you can start another thread referring to this one.
John
Bloodlines and Dwarfism
Nov. 6 2007
Question
Are there certain bloodlines that produce more dwarfs then others?
Vertical Limit
Carol Albritton
Vertical Limit Miniatures - Florida
Answer:
Carol,
From what I have personally seen, no there are not any bloodlines that
produce "more" dwarfs than others. It is spread throughout the industry
involving all of the common foundation stock bloodlines with all of the
different type of dwarfisms.
Because this "breed" came from a relatively small number of foundation
stock, and that a large amount of inbreeding was and still is being done, we
have basically stirred a pot of stew that is on the verge of becoming rank,
not adding anything new or fresh, not that it needs to be any other breed.
If we just learn that some horses within our own breed can keep us from
having that happen. Remember, a vast majority
a the
Miniature horses in the world have some common foundation stock somewhere,
and even if they say unknown up close or farther back, we all know the
practices of some breeders back in the beginning.
My example I always give is the 25% of the foals from 2 dwarf gene carriers
that do not have the dwarf gene whether tall or small. You
dont
know which ones those are, but IF some carriers are small and some small
horses are not carriers; and some tall ones are carriers AND some tall ones
are not WHY not keep them ALL?? We are slowly getting rid of half of the 25%
normal ones that just so happen to be tall, and they will NEVER produce a
dwarf, they do NOT have the defective gene.
John
Environmental factors
Nov. 6 2007
Question
Are there any known/proven "environmental factors" that produce dwarfism
aside from genetics? If so what are they or what are they believed to be?
Thank you for your time!!!!
MSR Minis - Ohio
Answer:
MSRminis,
There are no known or proven environmental causes to any of the dwarfisms in the Miniature horse.
The reason why this would be impossible for any of the dwarfisms to be due to a specific environmental factor is that it would have to be something to cause the exact mutation every time in every dwarf produced and it would have to occur all over the world.
These dwarfisms are seen in other parts of the world, and in Canada, and all over the US. The statistical chances of a single environmental factor to cause an exact mutation in the same gene to cause the identical physical condition of dwarfism all over the world for just ONE of the types I have characterized is just HUGE. This means hundreds of millions or hundreds of billions and more to one. I dont know how one would even try to calculate those chances. You would have to take into consideration all possibilities of the variances in concentration, quality, and mutagen power of the environmental factor throughout the world, all of the variations in the number of genes in the horse, the total number of genes, the horses genetic incompetetence of the DNA healing process of the fetus or mare and its eggs during oogenesis and the stallion for semen during spermatogenesis, variations in other mutagen causing agents that could enhance or restrict the specific mutagen envirnmental factor, and on, and on, meaning you have a much higher chance of winning every lottery in the US than that occuring in the Miniature horse all over the world to give you all the same dwarfism seen.
Now there are known environmental mutagens in the world that are known to cause some types of dwarfism in certain organisms, but those are shown to be very specific within a certain local area, meaning, isolated areas with organisms experiencing the exact same environment with the mutagen causing factor, i.e. a single farm with a mutagen causing agent on the farm, also chemicals or environmental factors that cause metabolic diseases in an organism are already developing, and these still are isolated cases.
I hope this helped.
John
Dwarf vs size
Nov. 6 2007
Question
John, I also would like to thank you for your willingness to discuss this
topic - the information gained will be so valuable to our industry.
I was just wondering - given that your family has had literally thousands of foals born over the years, DID you find that the foals from the "tinies" had more predisposition to dwarfism? Is there a height bracket that your family feels is the "cut-off" point - knowing full well that even if the horse is over the cut off point that it MIGHT still produce a dwarf, but the likelihood is far less.
Thank you,
Stacy
Mountain Meadows - Oregon
Answer:
Ok,
If you read my reply to Frank, I talked a lot about this. I do not have a
"cut-off" I do not know what it would be or even how you could calculate
that statistically, knowing that height is a quantitative trait, regardless
of the effect of the recessive gene, if any. Again, what we all talk about
is all highly subjective with height and being a carrier. Especially since I
see tall minis with normal heads produce type 3 dwarfs.
King Supreme never produced a dwarf, statistically, he has a 99.99+% chance
of NOT being a carrier.
Double Destiny never has either and it is even higher than that a 99.999+%,
of not being a carrier. This is because I have bred him to known carrier
mares of different pedigrees and inbred him into his pedigree a lot, and
bred him to a daughter.
I know of overs, well over that have had a dwarf bred to a smaller carrier,
so it really would be impossible to have a tall cutoff point given the fact
that there could be a homozygous normal 25" (non-carrier) horse out there
somewhere.
The only thing I do know is that I have yet to hear of a pure-bred Shetland
pony or Hackney any type of dwarf, especially not anything that looks like
what we see in the Minis.
John
Dwarfism Gene Types Nov. 6 2007
Question
John thank you so very much for your efforts here in answering our questions as well as in the research you are undertaking. You mentioned in an earlier post on the main forum that there is more than one dwarf gene type. I know that dwarfism manifests itself in more than one way but I am thinking that is not what you are referring to. Or is it? Are you thinking that a given gene will always produce a minimal dwarf and so on? If the gene types you are referring to are in fact indicators of something other than dwarf types, what is your research suggesting the significance of that might be for owners/breeders? Given what you know today, does that alter what we need to be looking at/for in our own animals and when purchasing new stock?
Thank you again! Eileen
Answer:
Your question is a little confusing but I will try to answer it.
"You mentioned in an earlier post on the main forum that there is more than
one dwarf gene type. I know that dwarfism manifests itself in more than one
way but I am thinking that is not what you are referring to. Or is it? Are
you thinking that a given gene will always produce a minimal dwarf and so
on? " Each
dwarf type, if they are definite different types will most likely involve
different genes for each type. This means type 1 is caused by a mutation in
gene A for example, and type 2 is caused by a mutation in gene D, and so on.
So, there is not a single dwarf gene for all the types and the gene is then
changed differently to cause the different types, that most highly unlikely
to be happening. This is given that in other animal's similar dwarfisms to
what I see in the Miniatures are occurring and they involve different genes
respectively. First there really is no "minimal dwarf" that has become a
slang term for carriers that show a lot of characteristics of dwarfism, and
for dwarfs that are very "good". If you don't know if the horse is a
carrier, are you sure it is just not bad conformation, again some people can
be quite wrong sometimes, and most of the time they can be right. This is
all subjective right now. There are normal horses with a recessive gene that
might show some expressivity, as I explained in another thread, by Annette.
The horse carrying that recessive gene is normal, in a sense. And a dwarf
that is a "good" dwarf is not any less of a dwarf than a more severely
affected dwarf of the same type, they are both homozygous for the dwarf
gene. Again, the expressivity manifested itself differently in each one,
same as seen in humans.
"If the gene types you are referring to are in fact indicators of something
other than dwarf types, what is your research suggesting the significance of
that might be for owners/breeders? Given what you know today, does that
alter what we need to be looking at/for in our own animals and when
purchasing new stock?"
That question doesn't apply I think with what I wrote above. There are
probably 4 different types of dwarfism probably caused by 4 different genes
that have been altered from normal somehow. There is a possibility that some
of these dwarfisms, I think maybe type 3, might be a combination of two
mutated genes that cause a type of dwarfism. Again, this is all
circumstantial to my findings. The significance of my findings for breeders
is that we will be able to improve this breed very quickly if the diseased
genes are found and tests can be made. I do not believe carriers should be
totally eliminated if that is what you are asking. I believe we should look
at what other very smart horse breeds did with diseases within a large
population of a breed, i.e. HYPP in the Quarter horse.
John
Percentages
Nov. 6 2007
Question
What percentages of miniature horses have you found in your studies to be
carrying dwarf genes? This would include minis up to and including 38". Are
some dwarf genes more prevalent than others?
Peggy
Albahurst
Miniatures
Answer:
It is unfortunately impossible to know those numbers. This is due to the
fact that some people do not admit that they have them, records are not kept
on dwarf foals born, aborted or anything by the Assoc., so there is no way
to know how prevalent these types are. I do have my educated guesses, but I
will not give those out specifically with regards to the populations I have
dealt with, meaning breeding programs. This is because it is so subjective
to only those horse populations I have dealt with, so those numbers would be
skewed and not reliable to a population as a whole if you want me to include
the horses up to 38" that have "some" Shetland close in their pedigree.
I will say this, with including all of these 4 dwarf types combined in the total population, and knowing the inbreeding done in the past and now, I would not be surprised if it is involving 1/8 to 1/2 of the total population, including those up to 38".
John
Were you able to identify equine dwarf genes in common
Nov. 6 2007
Question
Thank you for your time.
With the data you have accumulated from your studies -- have any "dwarf" genes been identified that are found in common between species (like equine and human)?
My understanding is that there are many genes contributing to dwarfism in equines -- rather than one or two specific genes.
Judith Jay (former owner of Nutmeg and Clove - dwarf minis in your study).
Fox Holler Farm
Answer:
JJay,
There are no known dwarf genes identified in the horse genome, meaning all horse breeds, compared to the dwarf genes known in the human. There are numerous known dwarfisms that are characterized and sequenced in the human, mouse, and cattle. These are what I am using to compare to as candidate genes.
I am the only one I know that has the samples needed, the pedigrees, and other inheritance pattern info needed to do this right. What I am doing is using the candidate gene approach to try to find the dwarf genes in the horse, which really are normal genes that have been mutated. This approach uses known genes in other mammals that have been found sequenced and characterized as producing a specific dwarf disease. I then try to see if certain known mammal dwarf diseases characterized, match as close as possible to the PHYSICAL characteristics of these dwarfs to then take that known gene and then compare it to the horses' unknown gene. Each try is a true shot in the dark, that is why physical characterization, ie, digital xrays and necropsies are necessary to keep the shots in the dark to a minimum.
Right now, I feel there are multiple genes involved to cause the different types seen. meaning one defective gene one type of dwarfism.
John
Breeding dwarf gene carriers (not Dwarfs)
Nov. 6 2007
Question
Hi John,
In your opinion, until we can identify carriers with testing, should all horses that have produced a dwarf be removed from future breeding? Or do you find that in some or even many cases, horses that have produced a dwarf still have enough good qualities to contribute to the betterment of the breed when bred to other partners?
And once a test is developed in the future, so that we can identify them, could we not still breed carriers to non-carriers with the assurance that they would not produce a dwarf?
Thanks,
Susan O.
Hilliard Horses-To-Hug
Answer:
Susan,
Okay this is going to be more of my ethical and caring, personal opinion and
less of my scientific opinion.
Science opinion would be to not breed them, the quicker they are removed the
quicker we can breed dwarf free Miniatures.............
HOWEVER, and BUT!!!!!!
We cannot punish breeders that have bought, bred, invested into horses on a false pretense, ie unknown genetics. It is in essence no one's fault currently, we have to look at the past for blame, and that can only be to look at our past history and move forward. Removing certain horses might be financially acceptable to some, others no, and some horses that are carriers have such an overall positive impact it would actually hurt our progression of the breed.
I do not believe ALL horses that have produced a dwarf be removed from a breeding program. In a perfect world with no consequences that might work. I'm just glad no higher power decided to do that to humans. We made this mess, God didn't, directly. We were the hands-on managers.
This is not cows, we cannot send them to slaughter like they did to "remove" the dwarfism in the Hereford and Angus breeds.
That being said, I believe WHEN the dwarfisms are characterized, sequenced and testes developed, we should teach our members what to do to breed the diseases out. We should label carriers on their pedigrees and NON-CARRIERS, and if someone wants to breed to carriers, remember, these are possessions owned by humans, legally we cannot keep anyone from doing anything with their possessions as long as it is not abuse.
Now all you PETA people can sit and rotate, breeding horses carrying a diseased gene is not abuse, how many of you PETA have a recessive or DOMINANT diseased, undesired gene that should not be perpetuated??? Should you reproduce, since you feel animals have the same rights as us?
Now if a dwarf is born, it is the owners decision what to with it. I have my protocol, some have a different one. I just hope you give me a call.
Also, breeding carriers to non-carriers will NEVER produce a dwarf. The non-carrier only give normal genes, and the carrier will only give a dwarf gene 50% of the time; so 50% of the resulting foals will be 100% normal and NEVER produce a dwarf, and the other 50% of the foals will only be carriers.
John
Life Expectancy and Health Issues
Nov. 6 2007
Question
Could you summarize for us the most common health issues associated with
dwarfism? Also, what is the average life expectancy (I assume it is
significantly shortened)?
Liz R.
Answer:
Liz,
The only common digestive issues that I know of for all of them except the type 2, is colic, impaction, and eating/chewing problems, obviously the most common disease issues caused by the diseased gene is the prominent leg, spine and hip malformations. These problems besides the teeth and jaw, will be the ultimate cause of the majority of their pain and problems from their malformed joints, arthritis, to malformed hoof growth, malformed leg and other bone growth, restricting their movement and mobility.
Life expectancy is shortened, depending on type, and care, some I have seen live into their double digits, i.e. 10 or more, but a vast majority I see only living from a few days, months or a few years is all.
John
What can breeders do to reduce the chance of a dwarf?
Nov. 6 2007
Question
First of all, thank you so much for this wonderful opportunity! My
question probably requires combining answers for other questions, but as
a breeder, I would like to know what steps I can take to reduce my
chance of producing a dwarf. For example, does that involve selecting
bloodlines with care, or avoiding certain characteristics in the
parents, (or heights), or just starting with the best conformation? Can
you make a list? I realize that some risk would remain unless there is a
test.
Mary
On Target Miniatures
Answer:
targetsmom,
If you refer to Annette's question that I answered it will help you. But
I can say that there is no specific list of characteristics to stay away
from, unfortunately. I wish I knew those answers!! Type one can have
carriers that have some expressivity of the recessive gene, but not all.
Types 2 and 3 really don't have much other than possibly a slightly
larger sized head, but it is a straighter head more "horse" looking head
compared to the type 1 carrier, not exotic, but not all exotic heads
mean type 1 recessive. Again, pedigree and knowledge of breeding results
of siblings, parents, etc. is the key to minimizing bad results, but not
a guarantee.
You want to breed the best conformation, BALANCED, horses you can.
Proportion is a major key.
Proper Proportion!!
John
Line breeding
Nov. 6 2007
Question
Do you feel that continually breeding the same lines to each other
contributes to dwarfism?
WPSellwood
Firewater Miniatures
Answer
wpsellwood,
To strictly answer your question yes, it is now and will continue to contribute to dwarfism.
Why?,
It is due to the same inferior genetics being stirred continuously in a festering pot, so to speak.
Line-breeding or in-breeding can be really, REALLY good and it can be really, REALLY bad. That said, the really bad resulting horse's years ago were not culled from the programs, because the ones that were small and most likely not that good of quality were quite possibly dwarfs. The small size was strictly the goal. If they had been culled due to their poor conformation, we might not have the problems as bad as we do today.
I am going to preface this with in my opinion.
As I said in another thread, there are a small number of small (height) homozygous normal horses being kept, but the taller homozygous normal horses that might be over 34" are kept OUT of the largest registry. Therefore, only half of the homozygous normal horses are kept in the largest registry, AMHA, this INCLUDES all other international registries, except the AMHR.
I hope some of them are reading this. We really need to learn as much as we can about the genetics of the Miniature horse and not some arbitrary height limit set by some breeders in the US (not all of them) that had goals that were not for the best conformed smallest horses, just the smallest animal that kind of looks like a horse. The original "Midget Pony Association" was to measure the horses at the withers 36" and under, from what I know from the past. So, I would think if our forefathers were able to "compromise" in the foundation of this "breed", then I would think they would have an interest to compromise even today knowing the genetics of today, not in 1978. This "breed" has become a world-wide love of the small equine. We have the ability to actually make what was started MUCH better. I will step down now.
John
Number of dwarves?
Nov. 7 2007
Question
Is there any documentation currently available regarding the number of
dwarves born in the US in the last year? I know the answer is probably
no but thought perhaps you have been able through your call for help
with this study to have some kind of ball park figure. Thank you so very
much for the research you are doing and for your willingness to share
your knowledge with us.
Nitta
Maine Pride Miniatures
Answer
Backwoodsnanny,
Someone asked a similar question on another thread, and no there is not a single ounce of documentation about any numbers of the dwarfs not only in the US but in the world. So the number of dwarfs that I have accumulated is not at all able to be used to calculate or project the total number of cases that might be occuring. The reason is that so many people are out there saying they have a dwarf but are unwilling to give any info about it. However, they still want work done to find a test so they never have one again.
My calls for help usually result in a small number of individuals that get the "big picture" that are willing give me the things needed, i.e. blood samples of dwarf and parents, pictures of all three, and pedigree info.
On the Best of the Lil beginnings forum right now there is a thread with info about all I need for my research and people that frequent this forum often STILL ask if anything is being done and is there anyone doing research, I just don't get it.
Most of the others will tell me they have one but are only willing to give me a picture, which is worthless for genetic research, or just a blood sample of the dwarf and no other info, especially no pedigree or parent samples. Unfortunately, those "random" samples I get, go into storage to be used AFTER I find the gene, mutation and a test, to confirm their type. So they are not able to be used in the pilot study.
And even after my call outs for samples, I continuously see people on the forums say they have dwarfs but are not any of the people that responded to me, so sometimes I just wonder, how many people whine and cry about the problem and say that something needs to be done, then when they have a chance, ooohh, well, don't include them, they don't want to have anyone know who the dwarf's parents are or whatever.
Sooner rather than later we will know a whole lot, and tests will be out there. So just realize if the test is out there and people don't have their horses done then you might wonder why, because I doubt very highly that the registries are going to require any dwarf tests when they come out. I really think they will try to take this as slow as possible.
John
O.K. Have a Dwarf
Nov. 7 2007
question
John Thank you so much for finding the time to do this, it is a great
idea. I just wish I could attend the Seminar- any chance of an on-line
one?? Now a hypothetical question....
Apart from the obvious care and attention etc., how could my little one's life and experience be put to good use in your program???
What sort of documentation would you like / need and how do we contact you??
Do you in fact still want / need this kind of input??
Jane
Shadow Play Miniatures
UK
Answer
You might want to ask the Canadian club about that for my Feb. seminar.
I still haven't found the genes yet, so all samples are welcome just
some samples that have or get which have all the things I need will be
able to be used now instead of later.
The more I have the better!
those samples with all the things I need is listed below.
1. If you have a live dwarf and want to send in blood samples;
Send to
John Eberth
Dept. of Veterinary Science
108 Gluck Equine Research Center University of Kentucky
Lexington KY 40546-0099
Included in the padded package needs to be the following list below and
all shipped UPS or FedEx 2nd day.
A. Profile pictures of dwarf, sire and dam (very important to
distinguish the type of dwarf and any characteristics of parents).
B. 2 tubes of blood in purple or yellow topped tubes. Label tubes with
"dwarf"
C. 2 tubes of blood as above from sire and dam if possible. Label each
tube "Sire" and "Dam"
D. Pedigree of sire and dam if you are willing to send it.
********* A total of six tubes of blood and DO NOT FREEZE THEM.
*************
2. Any donations of money can be sent To John Eberth at the address
above as well
***Please put for Miniature Horse dwarf research in memo.
3. If you have a dwarf or dwarf fetus that is NOT alive and wish to
donate it;
Please contact John IMMEDIATELY for instructions on what to do,
instructions will depend of age of dwarf or gestation of fetus. Email is
arionmgmt@aol.com, or his cell phone is 859-948-8106. If you cannot
reach him, put the dwarf in a plastic trash bag and in the freezer if
possible asap, if it is a fetus please wrap in saran wrap and in a
freezer bag if possible or a tightly tied plastic trash bag and put in
freezer asap.
Thank You for your help.
John
Speaking of proper proportions
Nov. 7 2007
question
Hi John,
Thanks for being here for us.
You are helping us more than you know so I appreciate your time.
John, I've gotten more than a little paranoid lately with all this talk of dwarfism again. I found myself last month going stall to stall doing a "nostril" check of all things to see if my horse's nostrils look like they are in the right place. Geesh..... I seem to be scrutinizing my stock now more than ever before and picking at every little millimeter of a thing. I've always been a professional worrier.
Like many others here and out there in mini-land, some of my mares are
the "old style" stocky, thicker necks, and larger boned. It does seem
that some of the dwarf characteristics you are talking about are more
connected with the old-style horses VS the more modern show stock out
there. Am I off base with this thinking?
Marty Garrison
Answer
You are being a worry wart, sorry to tell you.
Yes, there are carriers of the dwarf genes that I see are stocky or heavy boned, but I see just as many that are extremely refined.
Personal example, I foaled out a mare about 8 yrs. ago that was a retired multiple world champion, extreme in all the characteristics and an awesome mover for her height, she is 30". Her sire was a known carrier, she was bred to another world champion, but he was 28", relatively refined and young and his pedigree had known carriers in it. His first or second foal crop was her foaling yr., can't remember which but anyways, it was a dwarf, and it was her first foal. Though the dwarf was refined compared to others I have seen, it was still a dwarf type 1.
So again, you have refined bone structure having a slight influence on the disease just as the disease when carrier recessively has a potential to peek out in some characteristic, again goes back to penetrance and expressivity of the gene in a variable population, especially one like the minis with extreme variation of bone structure and size.
John
Have you seen any link with thyroid mares?
Nov. 7 2007
Question
I have known SEVERAL farms that had mares with a thyroid imbalance and
every one of them produced a dwarf foal. The mares were not on thyroid
meds during the time of pregnancy. When the horses did not resettle, it
was discovered it was due to low thyroid.
Has there been any study of these two things possibly being linked or a
'cause
and effect' thing? Or is this coincidental? All of these mares had had
previous normal foals prior to the thyroid going out of balance.
Laurie
Heather Glen Farm
Answer
There are certain types of
hypothoidism
that when occurring in the mother during pregnancy will cause certain
developmental retardations including growth and fertility. The links
from NCBI are vast, I chose to highlight the two links below that you
can look at to chew on awhile. The two OMIM links bring up cases that
the resulting babies showed dwarfism characteristics but were either
lethal or non-fertile, meaning the dwarf could not reproduce, this is
definitely not the case in the Miniature, because they can.
To try to critically examine your concern. Of those cases you have knowledge of about hypothyroid mares that have had dwarfs, have ALL the foals been dwarfs from ALL of those hypothyroid mares??
And your answer is -- "All of these mares had had previous normal foals prior to the thyroid going out of balance."
How do you know if the mares were hypothyroid before with the normal foals?? Were the mares tested for hypothyroidism during the gestation of the normal foals?? Were they tested for hypothyroidism during the gestation of the dwarf foals?? That would be the ONLY way to correlate the dwarfism is caused by the hypothyroidism in the mares. AND hypothyroidism would have to occur every time in the mares to produce a dwarf every time, and on top of that the dwarfs would need to have very similar characteristics.
How old are these mares now that they are hypothyroid?? Hypothyroidism can be late onset due to age, known to occur in older and geriatric horses.
Since the mare would have a great influence over the development of the foal with regards to thyroid levels in the fetus during the first few months, and if those all of those mares are hypothyroid then every foal from every hypothyroid mare has to be affected. I really believe it is suspect that hypothyroidism is causing all the dwarfisms, especially multiple types. Also, the dwarf cases that I have been able to follow very closely in large breeding populations follow perfect percentages for autosomal recessive inheritance. I will say very few mares that have produced a dwarf, that I have known for a long time through multiple foals, have shown hypothyroid characteristics, i.e. conception problems. On the contrary, quite a few carrier mares are prolific producers. That I know is not the case for hypothyroid mares, or hypothyroid mammals in general.
I have not tested blood from all mares that have produced dwarfs, heck I am lucky just to get a dwarf sample let alone enough blood from the mares to do any hormone testing. But again, for these dwarfs to be all over the world and all pedigrees, I would find it highly suspect for all these types to be caused by hypothyroidism alone.
Here is hypothoirism and dwarfism from NCBI, this site has links to just about any scientific database in the world
Specifically, I went to OMIM link below for the two links which deals human genetics and inheritance and comparing to animals
And this is the OMIA link from the NCBI link above, involving all animals including humans
https://omim.org/entry/613038
dwarfism
"Has there been any study of these two things possibly being linked or a 'cause and effect' thing? Or is this coincidental?
There have not been any in horses but the links above will give you a lot of info to chew on for a while.
John
achondroplasia question
Nov. 7 2007
Question
I know you are still in early stages of your research, but I was just
wondering if you think the method of inheritance for achondroplasia is
similar to what we've discovered in humans? Is it still a possibility,
or can we rule it out?
To save you the time typing it out for everyone, in humans:
1) Living achondroplastic dwarves are heterozygous for the mutation. The trait is dominant.
2) The majority of the time the mutation that causes achondroplasia is new, neither of the parents have the trait.
3) It has been suggested that in new mutations occur during sperm formation due to replication errors.
4) All populations are considered equally ak risk, but mutations at different locations have been discovered in different populations.
Many Thanks,
Colleen
Tellquest
Miniatures
Answer
ACH (short for Achondroplasia) in humans is caused by a single base pair
mutation in the FGFR3 gene. ACH is dominant and almost all of the cases
whether sporadic or inherited are dominant heterozygous, this is because
the dominant homozygous form (generally inherited from two dwarfs) is
severely affected usually causing early death. 90% of all of the ACH
cases are sporadic, which means they happen by chance and are not
inherited from the parents, the other approx. 10% is inherited from the
parents, meaning one or both of the parents are dwarfs.
This mutation occurs in oogenesis or spermatogensis, the terms used for the process the body uses for making egg and sperm, respectively. I do not know of any scientific study that has proven that the mutation only occurs in the sperm during spermatogenesis. Since it is a non-sex-linked disease, and it involves a gene that both males and females carry, it has just as much chance of sporadically mutating in the female as in the male.
Mutations at different spots in the FGFR3 gene are known and they do cause different types of bone growth abnormalities. These have been shown to be some sporadic in nature as well as some mutation being familial and inherited in specific families. I am currently collaborating with a human MD and Genetic specialist at the University of Washington, (Washington the state), he studies are specialized in the dwarfisms and mutations in the FGFR3 gene.
NOW all that being said to answer your question about if it is similar to the horses, yes and no. The horse's disease is inherited recessively, contrary to the ACH. There is a dwarfism in the humans that I am concentrating on right now in my lab work that is physically very smilar to the ACH look, but it is inheritaed recessively in the humans, just like the horses. There are other inherited traits in humans with AMDM that follow the minis very closely. So right now, the disease AMDM is where I am looking, along with having someone else help with looking at ACH.
John
Would you consider looking at photos?
Nov. 7 2007
Question
Would you be willing to look at a photo of a horse that I feel is
carrying dwarf characteristics and point out what you see about the
horse that makes it appear so (or not, at your discretion. I defer to
your experience and learning by all means)?
I have photos of a mare that was born here, and feel that she was a dwarf or certainly displaying dwarf characteristics and may in fact produce a dwarf if she were bred. If you would look at photos and maybe explain what you see that are dwarf characteristics, I would be happy to post some photos of her so that others could see (I've done it in the past, but again I and I'm pretty sure most of us defer to you as more of an expert in the matter).
Thank you again, I am thoroughly enjoying this, and feel it is long past due.
Liz
Answer
You can put the photo up here but
with out
a pedigree, I
cant
give you anything other than maybe as an answer, if you want to PM the
pedigree I can give you a better idea of somethings, and certain info I
will have to PM you, but general conformation I can comment on but it
will be circumstantial.
John
Trachea...
Nov. 7 2007
Question
First off..thank you so much for your time..
We had a dwarf born here several years ago..about 4 weeks after she was born she had a VERY difficult time breathing. Our vet confirmed that her trachea was closing and we had to have her euthanized.
Do you have any more information on this specific defect?
Christine
C&D's Little Steppers
Answer
I cannot comment specifically on your case, I would have to know
firsthand with the vet. But in human's certain dwarfisms cause the
magnum foramen to be misshaped and restricted in its function
causing breathing problems in humans. Human with certain dwarfisms
have to have surgery to correct it or they would suffocate and die.
I would imagine there are other nasal and trachea abnormalities that
would cause slow suffocation as the diseases progressed in the
humans and in the Minis. I have seen it as well with other dwarfs in
person. So, it is not surprising you had to put the foal down.
John
Dwarf Fetus Development..?
Nov. 7 2007
Question
Thank you SO MUCH for this amazing opportunity! I hope none of these
questions have been asked/answered yet!
How does the development of the dwarf fetus differ from that of a normal mini? At what point could you visually see the deformities? Could these be seen on an ultrasound? Do you have any photographs of aborted dawrfs from various stages of development? At what point in development can you see the type/severity of dwarfism?
Thank you very, very much!
Kaitlyn
Shoebox Stables
Answer
To answer your first question, I do not know. I would believe it
would be similar to dwarf development seen in other mammals, i.e.
cows, humans.
I do not know when you are first able to see the deformities. That could be a whole separate PhD degree.
It would take utrasounding hundreds of foals, with 3-D, 4-D and even MRI at all stages and then seeing which ones born are dwarfs and which aren't and then go back and compare measurements. In humans these things are known, with hundreds of thousands of cases documented and use of high power and high cost equipment. Unfortunately, only a hand full of vets in the world have these luxury pieces of equipment, and I don't see anyone lining up to pay for a study like this, sorry. It would take thousands of man hours and very knowledgeable vets and researchers all over, one vet or researcher could never do it.
I do have photos of dwarfs at varies stages of gestation, but I cannot show them here, sorry. Severity and type is usually seen later in gestation except for type 4, it is lethal early. Some of the types though are not distinguishable during early or even late gestation. It is not until a few weeks to months before it becomes evident which type it really is, this is due to the differences in the bone growth mutations.
John
Response to PM from nightflight Nov. 8 2007
Question
I
recieved
this PM below from
nightflight
suggesting all of ACH cases in humans has been proven to be solely
derived from the paternal side, i.e., sperm only. This paper she
sited I have listed below and it is available to read as a pdf, and
other formats free. It was written in 1998.
My answer is very detailed and very long so get a drink or whatever poison you take and sit awhile.
I am assuming she read the entire paper and understands the specific mutation they are discussing in the paper. I have this paper and I am giving the link below so all can read it.
FYI, the gene FGFR3 is not sex-linked and is on an autosome, meaning it is not on the X or Y chromosome. What this paper is explaining is in their 40 cases of ACH, the chromosome with this specific mutation derived from the father autosome not the mother. However, when a female ACH is born she can grow up to pass the defective gene onto 50% of her children irrespective of sex.
I do not know if Colleen was thinking all the dwarfisms in the Miniatures are strictly sire based but I hope you really read what I wrote below and try to read as much as you can in the links to understand my opinion as to the novelty of FGFR3 1138 and ACH, and how it is not very convincing at all to be the cause of the dwarfisms seen in the Miniatures from de novo mutations in sire's sperm.
from Colleen
"Thank you for your reply to my question =).
QUOTE
I do not know of any scientific study that has proven that the
mutation only occurs in the sperm during spermatogenesis. Since it
is a non-sex-linked disease, and it involves a gene that both males
and females carry, it has just as much chance of sporadically
mutating in the female as in the male.
END QUOTE
Not proven, but strongly suggested. I just googled this paper up, no sci-searches on this computer, so I can't speak to its quality, but good ones are out there. Not to say that mutation can only occur paternally, just when you consider the process of gamete formation that there are more chances for replication errors during spermatogenesis.
Title Mutations in Fibroblast Growth-Factor Receptor 3 in Sporadic Cases of Achondroplasia Occur Exclusively on the Paternally Derived Chromosome
Author(s) Douglas J. Wilkin, Jinny K. Szabo, Rhoda Cameron, Shirley Henderson, Gary A. Bellus, Michelle L. Mack, Ilkka Kaitila, John Loughlin, Arnold Munnich, Bryan Sykes, Jacky Bonaventure, and Clair A. Francomano
The American Journal of Human Genetics, volume 63 (1998), pages 711–716
Not equine related, but interesting in its own right. If you have a tame undergrad to spare there is more out there. =)
Many thanks for your time,
Colleen
Answer
The paper by Wilkin et.al. describes 40 cases involving 99
families with a sporadic case of ACH resulting from the SPECIFIC
mutation of the single base pair 1138 mutation of G(guanine) to
A(adenine) or G(guanine) to C(cytosine), resulting in a change
of amino acid 380 from glycine to arginine. Therefore, resulting
in this specific ACH mutation within FGFR3 ONLY to be derived
from the father, and that it also notes that increase in age in
men causes a higher mutation rate versus younger men.
I am quoting the paper summary
"More than 97% of achondroplasia cases are caused by one of two mutations (G1138A and G1138C) in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) gene, which results in a specific amino acid substitution, G380R. Sporadic cases of achondroplasia have been associated with advanced paternal age, suggesting that these mutations occur preferentially during spermatogenesis. We have determined the parental origin of the achondroplasia mutation in 40 sporadic cases. Three distinct 1-bp polymorphisms were identified in the FGFR3 gene, within close proximity to the achondroplasia mutation site. Ninety-nine families, each with a sporadic case of achondroplasia in a child, were analyzed in this study. In this population, the achondroplasia mutation occurred on the paternal chromosome in all 40 cases in which parental origin was unambiguous. This observation is consistent with the clinical observation of advanced paternal age resulting in new cases of achondroplasia and suggests that factors influencing DNA replication or repair during spermatogenesis, but not during oogenesis, may predispose to the occurrence of the G1138 FGFR3 mutations."
The paper explains it is strong "suggestive" evidence for only this mutation, and I agree, for THIS mutation only, and in HUMANS only. The authors only looked at this mutation, all of the other FGFR3 mutations resulting in ACH or other types of human dwarfism have not been studied for this, yet, that I have found. In the paper below regarding age and increase risk, they do link a possibility with FGFR2 and specifically, Apert Syndrome. There could be some paper out there somewhere that has done a similar study on a different mutation of FGFR3.
I have listed another overview paper that goes over a large amount of info that you all are encouraged to read. And in this paper, it has statistical information showing the increases in mutation rates of spermatozoa in men with increasing age.
I am also listing below another link to another current overview of ACH studies and findings and in that it states as I will quote so you do not miss it because the overview is rather lengthy.
http://www.ncbi.nlm....m.cgi?id=100800 <-- 2014 Link no longer works
"Using modern diagnostic criteria, Gardner (1977) estimated the
mutation rate at 0.000014.
Orioli
et al. (1986) reported on the frequency of skeletal
dysplasias
among 349,470 births (live and stillbirths). The prevalence rate
for achondroplasia was between 0.5 and 1.5/10,000 births. The
mutation rate was estimated to be between 1.72 and 5.57 x 10(-5)
per gamete per generation. The stated range is a consequence of
the uncertainty of diagnosis in some cases. (The
thanatophoric
dysplasia/achondrogenesis
group had a prevalence between 0.2 and 0.5/10,000 births.
Osteogenesis imperfecta had a prevalence of 0.4/10,000 births.
Only 1 case of diastrophic dysplasia was identified.) In the
county of Fyn in Denmark, Andersen and Hauge (1989) determined
the prevalence of generalized bone
dysplasias
by study of all children born in a 14-year period. The figures,
which they referred to as 'point-prevalence at birth,' showed
that achondroplasia was less common than generally thought (1.3
per 100,000), while osteogenesis imperfecta (21.8), multiple
epiphyseal dysplasia
tarda
(9.0),
achondrogenesis
(6.4), osteopetrosis (5.1), and
thanatophoric
dysplasia (3.8) were found to be more frequent. Stoll et al.
(1989) found a mutation rate of 3.3 x 10(-5) per gamete per
generation. In Spain, Martinez-Frias et al. (1991) found a
frequency of achondroplasia of 2.53 per 100,000 live births.
Total prevalence of autosomal dominant malformation syndromes
was 12.1 per 100,000 live births. "So
if you were to apply these same statistical calculations to
another mammal, to determine if this ACH mutation is
occuring
de novo from sporadic mutations or if it is being inherited
recessively, which is what you do with a population, you would
see that our dwarf type 1 alone numbers are much higher
percentages
Given this population statistics information above and applying the thought of just the type 1 dwarfism in ANY OTHER MAMMAL you would expect to see de novo mutations causing ACH to be approx. 2.5 cases per 100,000 live births. It is not seen. Unfortunately, I think we have quite a higher number than 2.5 births of just type 1 dwarfs in 100,000 Miniature births. I do not know how many Miniatures are born worldwide each yr. but it is not 100,000.
I dont even think there are 250,000 miniatures TOTAL worldwide. That being said it would mean we would have to be having at least 100,000 foals born a year and only see 2.5 dwarfs of type 1 born. Or more realistically have 1,000 births and have 0.025 dwarf type 1 born per year. THis does not even count the other types of dwarfism I am seeing.
Again, my numbers in fairly large variable pedigree population of Miniatures horses, calculations so far in the miniatures that I have done, the type 1 dwarfism is showing a CLASSICAL Mendelian inheritance pattern consistent with the mutation being a homozygous autosomal recessive trait. The other types I have not done yet, due to the difficulty in getting samples and information from owners.
So, with this knowledge and knowledge that there is only one other equine breed that has seen possibly some type of inherited dwarfism( i.e. Friesians, which is speculative right now as autosomal recessive as well), it would very narrow minded to think that the large number of dwarfs, comparatively, seen in the Miniatures are strickly de novo sire based. Since dwarfs were known to be used for breeding decades ago. I can list over 100 type 1 dwarfs that I have seen since 1978, I unfortunately don't have all those as samples or I would might already have answers. I recieved last yr alone 10 type 1 dwarf foal blood samples or bodies to my lab that were born last year. That is not close to the number I see on the internet discussed that were born last year asking about info.
There is no other known mammal that exists that shows the FGFR3 1138 mutation to be paternally derived, AND that there is no known information that I can find that suggests also to
have the increased mutation rate of FGFR3 in germline cells of other male mammals. Consequently, the dwarfisms found so far in other mammals that have been sequenced and characterized have yet to show characteristics of being caused by a mutation in FGFR3 the same seen in the humans, or even more specifically ACH 1138 mutation, meaning paternally derived, and increased risk with age. This does not include knockout lab mice and rats used for research in dwarfism. It is right now novel to itself from natural occurrence.
The Dexter dwarf is not caused by a mutation in FGFR3, nor is the dwarfism in Japanese brown cattle caused by FGFR3.
There are known to be a mirad of other mutations within the FGFR3 that produces ACH or other ACH like diseases, all with various characteristics and names. And it would not suprise me if some other mutations in FGFR3 or FGFR1 or FGFR2, show germline cause from the male, since the male has more cell divisions in the germline production than the female. But again, the characteristics of this mutation of ACH 1138 is only seen in humans so far from what I have read.
quoting from one of the overviews--
"In discussing 'male-driven evolution' and the evidence for a generally higher mutation rate in males than in females, Crow (1997) stated that the number of cell divisions required to generate sperm cells in a 30-year-old man is estimated at 400; the number of cell divisions that generate an egg is 24, irrespective of age. If mutation rates are proportional to the cell divisions, the male-to-female ratio should equal 17. In fact, the data show a higher ratio, as if mutation rates increase at a higher rate than the number of replications would predict--not surprising if fidelity of transcription and efficiency of repair mechanisms diminish with age. Studies in male and female birds by Ellegren and Fridolfsson (1997) appeared to support male-driven evolution of DNA sequences in birds. "
I hope this answered your question Colleen, I just felt this needed to be posted here since there is so much info in this response that will help others to understand more about the complexities of genetics.
I hope you continue looking for all the info you can find.
John
The Origin of Dwarfism
Nov. 8 2007
Question
I have been reading these posts with much interest, and while I
know much is still unknown, it is encouraging to see answers are
immanent. Pardon me if this has been asked before, but I found
this observation from one of your previous answers very
interesting:
QUOTE
The only thing I do know is that I have yet to hear of a pure-bred Shetland pony or Hackney any type of dwarf, especially not anything that looks like what we see in the Minis.
With Shetlands being the most common breed, our Minis have
descended from, where/how do you believe dwarfism originated?
Tiffany
Rock river Minis
Answer
First what usually happens in all animals are known genetic
mutations that occur that are referred to as non-deleterious or
silent mutations, which occur all over the body including in
germline cells,
ie
sperm and egg cells. They are usually harmless to the organism.
However sometimes, there are mutations that occur that can have
bad results, some of those mutations can be cancer,
etc,
and some can occur in germline cells that result in diseased
offspring due to a dominant mutation, or offspring that has a
recessive mutation and appear normal.
What most likely happened in the Miniatures is that some germline cells in some horse many years ago, mare or stallion, most likely a stallion or stallions, since they have high germline mutation rates and since there are different types of dwarfisms, produced sperm that conceived a normal looking foal that had a recessive mutation. This could have happened to more than one horse, mare or stallion, we do not know, and will never know, EVER, the root cause. Anyways, the resulting foal later bred and passed on this recessive mutation to 50% of its offspring, and so on, and so on, until sooner or later related horses were bred together carrying the recessive mutation and 25% of the foals were dwarfs. That is why highly inbred animals quickly display recessive deleterious traits, an inheritance fact well known and documented in animal breeds. It is well known that severe inbreeding increases genetic abnormalities seen in resulting offspring from recessive traits.
Later those dwarfs were bred because they were very small, which is very likely what was done early on due to the small numbers of miniatures that existed. Perpetuating the gene.
John
Normal Pundits square
Nov. 9 2007
Question
John,
1. In your opinion are the majority of the animals you have
worked with heterozygous animals for the trait of Dwarfism. and
as such can a simple pundit's square be used once we know the
specific genetic markers that constitute these traits?
2. Have you found examples of homozygous horses for dwarfism?
3. Are the dwarf genes in miniatures for all four types of dwarfism that you have identified found on the same alleles and/or position in the DNA string. If not have you been able to isolate any of them yet.
By the way thanks for your time and expertise, it is appreciated
greatly.
John Cherry
Cherryville Farms
Answer
John,
To answer your first question, Yes, the majority of the horses I
have worked with are heterozygous for the dwarfism in Minis,
that IS why I have worked with them, they have produced dwarfs.
I have not gone out looking for horses as many horses as I can
that have never had dwarfs, if I did, how could I do any
research regarding dwarfism??
The good and the bad is that the good part is there are
non-carriers, calculated by statistical analysis of normal
offspring, the bad news is that there are a large percentage of
carriers that have produced dwarfs. I do not know the exact
percentage, people are notorious about denying their horses have
had dwarfs. I would educatedly guess at between 1/8 to 1/2 the
population, I believe I said this in another thread.
I do look for specific horses that have had a large number of
foals (100 or more foals with no dwarfs), which are obviously
stallions. I look for those horses because they statisically are
suggestive of being Homozygous normal and not to be carrying any
dwarf genes. Since I do not know which genes are involved and I
do not know where these genes are, you have to use population
analysis of inheritance.
What you are referring to is the Punnett Square, where a square
is divided into quads and the percentages of inheritance is show
regarding genes that are inheritaed in classic Medelian fashion.
Below is my meager attempt to show a Punnett Square in this
forum typing program. As can be seen with respect to dominant
and recessive classic Mendelian inherited genes we can already
calculate percentage of affecteds, heterozygous non-affecteds,
and homozygous normals. The populations I have worked with show
these percentage calculations convincingly.
parent Aa
A a
_________________ Offspring 25% AA homozygous normal
A | | | 50% Aa heterozygous normal
| AA | Aa | 25% aa homozygous affected (dwarf)
parent Aa |________|________|
| | |
a | Aa | aa |
|________|________|
If we know these gentic markers for these dwarfisms we do not
need to use the Punnett Square we only need to have a test done.
"2. Have you found examples of homozygous horses for dwarfism?"
Answer is Yes, it is a dwarf. Horses homozygous for dwarfism are
dwarfs, they are homozygous for the defective recessive gene,
therefore express the gene and only that gene, because they do
not have a normal gene that would be dominant over it.
"3. Are the dwarf genes in miniatures for all four types of
dwarfism that you have identified found on the same alleles
and/or position in the DNA string. If not have you been able to
isolate any of them yet."
Your question is a little confusing for what I think you are
asking, I will try to decode it and answer it for others to see.
First, I have not identified the actual genes, that is what all
this lab work I am doing is. I have only segmented and
characterized 4 different dwarf sydromes/characteristics that
have shown to be inherited and expressed in a classic Mendelian
manner, thus making me able to posture and predict the existence
of recessive dwarf genes in the population that are being
perpetuated by breeders due to the inferior breeding practices
of our forefathers.
In other words, I have seen four very unique types of dwarfs
each type having very consistent unique characteristics,
consistuting the theory of four different mutations. Using
population analysis of the populations of horses I have worked
with, these diseases are showing results of being autosomal
recessive diseases. Each possible disease is (possibly) its own
allele. Lets say type 1, if you are a carrier, you have two
alleles at that spot in the DNA, one allele is the normal gene,
the other is the defective recessive dwarf type 1 allele. Now
apply that to all 3 others. Each disease (each possibly with its
own allele) can be and might very well be on any part of any of
the 30 autosomal chromosomes in the horse. I am looking for four
needles and each are in their own hay stack.
If I had isolated them I would already know the gene that causes
the disease. I dont even know the gene for definite that it is
the same gene as I have characterized as comparing it to humans
or other animals, ie dexter cattle for type 4. Simply put, type
1 is very similar in physical characteristics and inheritance to
the human disease AMDM. The human gene mutation that causes the
AMDM has only recently (2004) been found, characterized and
sequenced! The dexter cattle one has just been found this last
year!!
I just now have enough type 1 samples that the UK feels it is
realistic to find anything out. Remember, just having a handful
of random samples of some diseased organisms is not going to get
you very far in anything with genetics. You could spend your
life and still not have any answers. Large numbers of samples
with parents are absolutely the key to finding a diseased gene
relatively quickly.
Also I am the only one working on this in my lab, and the only
one in the world, that I know of, that has the number of samples
to accomplish anything. Noone else has even had the sense to try
to characterize the differences in dwarfs that have been seen
for years, until I did 2 years ago. Everyone that I know of that
has said they are doing research on this, I asked how many
samples they had, if they had parent samples, and if they had
pics, and if they knew how inconsistent the dwarfs were and that
this might be very complicated etc,etc, and I got every time was
, uh...., well, no..... They were basically blindfolded spinning
in circles trying to shoot at a moving target, good luck.
I do not have a whole facility looking for these genes, like
most large scale human diseases are done with HUNDREDS of
millions of dollars used. I hope this puts my daunting task into
perspective!!
John
Gene Breeding question
Nov. 9 2007
Question
I have a question. Do the genes have to match in order to
produce a dwarf?? Like One horse carries gene A and is bred to a
horse carry gene
B..this
can produce a dwarf? or do they both have to carry gene A??
Or does that produce different types??
Sorry..full
of questions
Christine
C&D's Little Steppers
Answer
I don't really understand your question but I will try to
answer.
If you mean that if one horse carries a dwarf gene type A and is bred to another horse that carries dwarf gene type B, that the foal might be a dwarf??
If those genes are actual separate recessive genes, and are not linked, then the foal will have only a 25% chance of carrying both genes. The foal will not be a dwarf because the genes are at different loci, and the normal alleles are dominant so the foal will be carrying TWO DIFFERENT dwarf genes recessively.
What you were quoting me when you asked the question, I was referring to the chance that there is a very good possibility that there are some horses out there that carry more than 1 dwarf gene recessively. Meaning when that horse carrying two separate dwarf type disease genes is bred to another horse that is a two-diseased gene dwarf carrier there is a chance that a foal could be produced that has ALL four diseased genes from both parents causing the foal to exhibit the characteristics of BOTH dwarfisms. This obviously would be very bad. That is something I am considering for the type 3 dwarfs due to their severe characteristics and low percentage numbers when compared to the other types. However, I am NOT ruling out a single 1 gene mutation it just would not have the penetrance in the population of the type 1 due to the severity of the disease, ie they are bred or live long enough to breed because of the severity of the disease.
John
Ideally, what would you like?
Nov. 9 2007
Question
John,
Are you able to house animals at your research facility currently? Say, I have a pair who produced a dwarf, (I have not) and I'd be willing to donate them ALL, both parents and the resulting foal, (plus pedigrees) to you, would you be interested in taking them? (turning ownership over to you, or not)
I'm asking if you would like them to rebreed and study the resulting foals, not put them to sleep.
Also, I understand that the AMHA is helping to fund your studies (through donations), but I also imagine that funds are tight. Could we PAY, ourselves, to deliver samples to you, to help with funding in a little way?
I also know some of us are environmentalists (we "own" whales here on Cape Cod) Why not ask for a Christmas gift of a donation to the Genetic Research fund from Santa? Every little bit helps!
dru
Answer
The facility is Arion Mgmt. my farm. And I do not really want or
need to house carriers, I have some already and I have numerous
breeders that house their own already and give me blood
donations. What I have done is take a dwarf at times, depending
on type and age, to study growth of the disease, x-ray, get
blood from, get blood from parents, etc., and then euthanize
when appropriate. They do not die in, they are helping me learn
from our own ignorance and blindness to the problem we have
created.
UK has a farm but they are not experienced enough to deal with this kind of care, for dwarfs especially. It again is all me, myself, and I.
The AMHA only donated $1935.00 to UK and another $1935.00 to TAMU, which half of those amounts were from member donations raised 2 years ago, so in essence members donated 1935.00 and AMHA donated 1935.00. UK put up $20,000.00. I have had personal donations of another $3000.00 given to me that have been sent to UK directly where I am doing my research.
When someone wants to send samples they already pay for the shipping as it is right now.
I would love a present from Santa!!!
John
Mare's foaling history or fertility issues...
Nov. 9 2007
Question
With the goal in mind of reducing the chances of producing a
foal, I have a couple of hypothetical questions. 1. If I have a
mare (or see one for sale) that has had 14 registered foals over
her lifetime, bred to different stallions, is it a fairly safe
bet that she is not a dwarf carrier? Or was she just lucky?
2. On the other hand, if I see a mare that has had only one or two foals over 10 years (or a history of abortions) and she has a known dwarf in her pedigree, is that an indication tha she might be carrying a dwarf gene (maybe for type 4)??
Or is this just wishful thinking that you can tell anything from foaling history?
Thank you so much!!
Mary
On Target Miniatures
Answer
No, too many variables.
The breed in and of its self is very problematic when you try to correlate something like that. We already know there are higher rates of dystocia than a large horse breed, irregardless of dwarfism present in the foal. We know that Miniatures have a higher incidence of subfertility, and lower conception rates in mares than large horse breeds, irregardless of dwarfism. Nutrition and feeding management alone could cause a decrease in conception rates in mares, that is known already when comparing heavy or thin mares to ideal weights.
Not to mention previous owner's equine knowledge and management skills could have been nil at best, who knows.
All I can say is good luck.
John
A couple questions.
Nov. 9 2007
Question
Michelle at Wesco and I have frequently had the hypothetical
conversation of what if the traits we are breeding for in our
refined minis such as domed head, big eyes, those "cute little
heads" are actually linked to dwarfism. What is that
possibility?
Also, in type four that (if I understand this right) causes to abort early, at what stage of gestation would you likely see abortion?
Kathi Donnell
WARDS CREEK RANCH
Answer
They wouldn't be Linked as per the true genetic definition of
gene linkage.
BUT
What this situation COULD be is that the type of horses we are
breeding for MIGHT and I stress MIGHT, MAYBE or POSSIBLY, and
HYPOTHETICALLY. You get my drift, anyways, those characteristics
could be traits from a recessive dwarf gene that has some
expressivity over the dominant normal. And this does NOT mean
size is
wholely
involved. So
yes
we COULD be. BUT no one knows that yet. And it could be only one
type has the ability to show the penetrance and expressivity
over the normal, again I do not know.
I discussed in detail these things in the first thread I answered at the bottom.
Type 4 is lethal, what the earliest stage of gestation, I do not know, it could be 4 weeks, it could be 3 months, I do not know. The smallest fetus I have showing the characteristics fits in the palm of my hand, and it was just by chance that it was found in a stall that the mare was being kept in. Had she not been in a stall no one would ever had found it and assumed, nothing until she would have been checked months later. The furthest along I believe from the owner's comment was about 7+ months gestation. It had just started to develop hair fuzz.
John
Help me to understand
Nov. 9 2007
Question
QUOTE
Also, breeding carriers to non-carriers will NEVER produce a dwarf. The non-carrier only give normal genes, and the carrier will only give a dwarf gene 50% of the time; so 50% of the resulting foals will be 100% normal and NEVER produce a dwarf, and the other 50% of the foals will only be carriers.
END QUOTE
The above is a quote made by you in another thread. My question is, does this mean that ANY horse that produces a dwarf IS automatically at least one type of dwarf?
Also, I have a question in regards to the hypothyroidism/dwarf connection question you answered. I have read and re-read it, but I am not sure if you are answering to that specific case mentioned by the original poster, or if you are answering it in regards to all? You said:
QUOTE
I really believe it is suspect that hypothyroidism is causing
all the dwarfisms, especially multiple types.
END QUOTE
Does this mean you feel there IS DEFINITELY a connection link from ALL cases of hypothyroidism, or that you doubt it to be so?
Thank you for your time in answering these questions by all of
us. This dwarf topic has been brought up many times, and we can
only give educated/non-educated guesses, so it is nice to have
you here to answer questions with your vast expertise!
Mona
The Money Pit Ranch
Answer
Mona,
Please reread out loud what you quoted me saying, I think you
are confusing yourself.
QUOTE
Also, breeding carriers to non-carriers will NEVER produce a
dwarf. The non-carrier only
give
normal genes, and the carrier will only give a dwarf gene 50% of
the time; so 50% of the resulting foals will be 100% normal and
NEVER produce a dwarf, and the other 50% of the foals will only
be carriers.
END QUOTE
If you have a stallion that is a homozygous normal, i.e. non-carrier for any dwarfism. This means he has NO dwarf genes, and he is bred to mares that are carriers of any of the dwarf genes, are you going to get a dwarf. Answer NO NEVER, the normal genes are dominant, all of the foals will be normal, HOWEVER, 50% will be carrying a dwarf gene inherited from the mare.
A carrier is NOT a dwarf, it is a carrier of a recessive dwarf gene, it physically and conformationally is a normal horse, genetically it is carrying an inferior gene not being expressed.
To speak more plainly with regards to the hypothyroidism and dwarfism, I do not at all believe the dwarfism in the Miniatures is caused by hypothyroidism
It would be very foolish to think that miniatures all over the world are that are having dwarfs are all hypothyroid, they would all have to be genetically and environmentally in the same situation, meaning same environments, and same genetic susceptibility for having low thyroid hormone production.
BTW reread what I wrote about my questions to her---
quote from the other thread I wrote--
"To try to critically examine your concern. Of those cases you have knowledge of about hypothyroid mares that have had dwarfs, have ALL the foals been dwarfs from ALL of those hypothyroid mares??
And your answer is -- "All of these mares had had previous normal foals prior to the thyroid going out of balance."
How do you know if the mares were hypothyroid before with the normal foals?? Were the mares tested for hypothyroidism during the gestation of the normal foals?? Were they tested for hypothyroidism during the gestation of the dwarf foals?? That would be the ONLY way to correlate the dwarfism is caused by the hypothyroidism in the mares. AND hypothyroidism would have to occur every time in the mares to produce a dwarf every time, and on top of that the dwarfs would need to have very similar characteristics.
How old are these mares now that they are hypothyroid?? Hypothyroidism can be late onset due to age, known to occur in older and geriatric horses.
It would be very SUSPECT for someone to believe that is the cause of the dwarfism, without acknowledging any of the known genetic problems we have and our history in breeding dwarfs.
I hope this cleared it up.
John
Castration findings
Nov. 9 2007
Question
In your research have you found any link between a mature
colt (2+ years old) having 1 very large testicle and 1
small/normal testicle at gelding time and a pedigree that is
known for producing dwarfs?
Thank you for your time.
Betty B.
Answer
No,
That would be something to look at more for cryptorchidism alone. Even if your colt had both testicles descended. If the measurements of the testicles were outside of expected norms for size, either too large, or too small, you would look at cryptorchidism first, I would. It is well known that cryptorchid horses have one descended testicle that is larger than normal in size, when measured. And that the retained testicle is smaller than normal in size when it is removed.
There are known dwarfism in humans that see cryptorchidism, but that is when the human is a dwarf, not a normal human and being crypt. A normal human and being crypt would be looked at as a cryptorchid first not a dwarf or a carrier first. I assume your horse is normal and not a dwarf.
John
How close are we?
Nov. 9 2007
Question
Hi John,
Thank you so much for answering questions for us. From
reading your replies it appears that once the dwarf gene is
identified and can be tested for we will be able to make
much better decisions about our breeding programs. Similar
to the LWO, if you have 2 carriers of dwarf you wouldn't
breed them. My question is: realistically, how long do you
think it will be before we identify the gene and then can
test for it.
Sandy
Total Eclipse Miniatures
Answer
Sandy,
It could be several months, it could be literally several years. It all depends on number of samples that can be used in early studies, amount of money raised for research, and how little sleep I can function on, I am the research lab so to speak.
John
A minimal dwarf and
Nov. 9 2007
Question
John, THANK YOU for taking the time from all of us wanting
to learn more about the betterment of our breed. I had a
very minimal dwarf born out of a mare that I bought bred.
When it came time to geld my little guy, (about 2
yrs
old, and in good health) my vet refused saying he didn't
really know what was all going on with him (???) but yet at
the age of 5 years old without my vet realizing this was my
minimal dwarf, he gelded. He was fully dropped at the age of
2. Could you please explain to me what problems he would of
all come across gelding him earlier, rather than later? He
had a bad bite, and a "barrel" belly, and was a little weak
in his hind end, which he seemed to outgrow. I could
understand if he was a severe dwarf, and had not dropped,
but that wasn't the case. Is it common for a vet to wait
with gelding a minimal dwarf and why?
Corinne
Meadowridge Farm
Answer
I do not know of any problems gelding a dwarf at 2, other
than him not having both testicles dropped yet. I would
think that if they were both dropped that he would not put
him under general anesthesia, just sedate him and cut. I
just think he didn't want to do it or was afraid he would
kill him by accident and be sued.
John
Genes
Question
If a specific gene has not been isolated, how do we know for sure that there is one, and that some horses are just carriers?
Do you believe that a dwarf can be produced if both parents
are non-carriers, and normal horses? And by that, I mean,
are some dwarfs produced because environmental factors or
trauma during pregnancy, like if the development and growth
were disturbed by some factor other than a gene passed from
a parent? If this is the case, will it really ever be
possible to have a dwarf free breed?
Matt Drown
Answer
"If a specific gene has not been isolated, how do we know
for sure that there is one, and that some horses are just
carriers? "
It is called population genetics, I advise you get a book about it, in there it will explain about genes and generational large-scale inheritance patterns with respect to dominant and recessive genes.
How did researcher's years ago know that in humans there are different blood types and there are specific inheritance patterns of those types???? and this was before DNA testing.
There is a mountain of information about inheritance of recessive genes and how generations can go on before it crops up.
I think you need to read some basic genetics books and specifically read about inheritance of recessive genes, because you just answered your own question. I am not making these terms up or these known genetic inheritance facts. These are genetic rules that have been scientifically proven. I applied genetic laws to my study and it fits.
Recessive genes exist in all living organisms even bacteria and viruses. They are not expressed unless certain conditions are met. This can be either by reproduction of the organism and the resulting offspring inherit it or like in certain bacteria can live in certain changing environmental conditions.
And no, dont get the idea that dwarfism is a gene that can willy nilly turn on or off, it is not that kind of gene. There are those kinds of genes in us, yes, called regulatory genes of certain pathways, metabolism, digestion, etc.
If you are a carrier of a gene you have the gene in your DNA and can pass it on to your offspring.
"Do you believe that a dwarf can be produced if both parents are non-carriers, and normal horses? And by that, I mean, are some dwarfs produced because environmental factors or trauma during pregnancy, like if the development and growth were disturbed by some factor other than a gene passed from a parent? If this is the case, will it really ever be possible to have a dwarf free breed?"
Two non-carriers (proven) will not produce a dwarf of that gene they are NOt carrying. If they are non-carriers of one type, yet are carriers of another type, they could have a dwarf of the other type they carry.
I have not read yet anything about dwarfism being caused by trauma, do you have a specific type of trauma you are thinking about????
Well I will say there are no dwarfs in the Shetlands that I have seen documented, or the Hackney, or the POA, or the Arab, or the Welsh, or Caspian, Dartmoor pony. I don't know, how can they have breeds without dwarfism?? Maybe breed better horses??
Someone PLEASE bring me an example of your dwarf caused by an environmental factor, that you can definitively say is just that. I will never say that no unusual random event can't happen to then cause a dwarf. On the contrary, how do you think genes can get mutated, they mutate due to random events or influences. And no don't think that all these dwarfs are caused by random events causing the same gene to be mutated.
I would challenge anyone to find dwarf Miniature horses that they can prove was caused by a single common environmental factor all over the world that could be proven as the reason why we have all of these dwarf horses. Please go my son, make me proud.
What I am trying to teach you is that look at your
population of Miniatures, in all areas of the world. Now
look at all the different environments they are in, now look
at all the dwarf type 1 only that are born. Now, you tell me
that one specific type with very similar characteristics
have a chance of being caused by something in the
environment, ALL OVER THE WORLD. Which also would need to be
in the exact same conditions. If just one of these dwarfisms
was caused by even just 1 environmental factor, you would
need a super computer to figure your odds to prove it is NOT
being caused by a gene. This is because of the billions of
variables because these dwarfs occur all over the world. The
odds are tremendously in my favor of it being a recessive
gene.
John
Bloodline to Bloodline
Nov. 9 2007
Question
Hi John
I was wondering if you believe that certain bloodlines when crossed with other certain bloodlines are more likely to produce a dwarf (parents are all beautiful with no dwarf characteristics). I have noticed that problem with a couple of bloodlines that I will keep private (you are welcome to PM me) - it seems that when they are crossed that there is a higher incidence of dwarfs produced than when crossed with other bloodlines - enough so, to make me question whether the dominant gene theory might also correspond to an "attraction" theory - for sure not wording this correctly, but I imagine you get the gist of it.
Thanks John
Stacy
Mountain Meadows Miniatures
Answer
Stacy,
Not I'm sure I get your drift, but I will try. What dominant
gene theory are you talking about??? The dominant gene genetic
law that is a true genetic fact that exists, it's not a theory.
My opinion right now about what is going on is a genetic theory
that I am working to prove. My theory is that the dwarfisms are
caused by recessive genes.
There is no "attraction" theory in genetics with regards to genes. There is a gene linkage fact that is known to be true. It is when two or more genes are located on a chromosome within close proximity of each other and they get inherited all together, or in a higher percentage, from one parent. This is a different ratio than what is seen normally in chromosomal assortment, what is known as Random Assortment of chromosomes.
What you are seeing is that those bloodlines are carriers. Whether they are producing a higher percentage than 25% would be hard to calculate without knowing all the numbers. I would think that you had bad role of the dice. Remember, each foal is in and of itself a separate event, just because you had a gorgeous foal last year does not mean it will be the same next time. Are all your kids identical, (if they are not identical twins I assume), I doubt they are. So, what you see is the beauty of genetics, every year is Christmas presents, sometimes you get a tie.
When you used the other bloodlines did you get any dwarfs at all?? Again, I do not have enough info to really know what you are asking. The only thing I can think of is that the bloodlines you were using and getting a lot of dwarfs might have more than one dwarf gene involved because you are not specific on type of dwarfs, I am assuming it could be more than one type you are seeing.
John
Environmental Birth Defects That Mimic Dwarfism???
Nov. 12 2007
Question
I think from your previous answers that you have made it
very clear that you do not believe that environmental
factors are the cause of the gene mutation/s that cause
dwarfism.
However, is it possible that environmental factors can disrupt normal fetal development and cause 'environmental' birth defects that manifest themselves in the same TYPE of deformities that we see caused by 'genetic' dwarfism (ie: limb deformities and undershot jaw, etc.)? I am thinking of things like nitrate poisoning which was believed to be the possible cause of birth defects in some Canadian horses.
If environmental factors can cause developmental birth
defects that have many of the same outward deformities as
genetically caused dwarfism, how can a breeder determine if
their foal's problems are from genetic or environmental
causes?
R3 Minis
Answer
R3,
Below is the link from Canada making a notation on the
theory of hypothyroidism in smaller horses possibly due to
nitrate toxicity. Thyroid function, normal or abnormal,
influences the growth of all animals, this notation in the
Ontario website describes rather poorly and generally a
PROPORTIONATE dwarfism. The dwarfisms I am researching are
categorized as DISPROPORTIONATE dwarfism.
Proportionate dwarfism refers to the "shrinking" of
everything in proportion, including bone size.
Disproportionate dwarfisms are NOT like that, they have
certain bone growth that is abnormally "shortened".
Malformed elastic or restricted joints due to underdeveloped
bone from cartilage. Shorter long bones than should be for
their size, BUT this is due to the disease affecting the
LENGTH of the bone growth. That is the part of growth that
is restricted.
In their description they describe generally, small PROPORTIONATE horses from small horses (possibly Miniatures or Shetland, don't know, they don't say). They go on to generally describe the foals as with musculoskeletal IMMATURITY, NOT shortened elastic or restricted joints. Meaning very refined, structure, i.e.. immature or premature looking. They also describe delayed cuboidal bone development, which is a bone in the lower legs of the horse, this description would in plain terms be immature cuboidal bone causing hyperextended joints, or weak legs and joints, like an underdeveloped foal. A large head is listed but not described in detail, and if it were severely domed I would think that would be mentioned.
Floppy ears are listed and I do not know of that as being a known common characteristic in dwarf foals in the Miniatures. I see the ears set back on the head due to the head's domed shape but not "floppy", they function fine.
Mandibular brachygnathia means the foals had a severe OVERBITE, that the lower jaw is underdeveloped. That is not what is seen in the Miniature dwarfs which is an underbite, that is a characteristic quite common in the dwarfisms I am studying in the Miniatures.
Quote from a different section of the same website from Canada
"Brachygnathia refers to a malocclusion between the mandible and the maxilla. Mandibular brachygnathia is most common and refers to an abnormal shortening of the mandible which results in an overshot upper jaw or parrot mouth."
They did not give a reference paper or article, so I do not know where this informatin has come from.
They also strongly recommend testing thyroid levels and nitrate levels so as to not OVER diagnose this disease due to supposed low thyroid levels due to nitrate toxicity.
I am assuming this is the Canadian article you are referring to.
http://www.omafra.go..._congenital.htm
Quote from the website--
"Dwarfism refers to the failure of appropriate growth resulting in a smaller horse. A dwarf horse can be proportionate or disproportionate. Proportionate dwarfs are a result of a deficiency in growth hormone while disproportionate dwarfs result from abnormal thyroid hormone levels. The latter results in a foal with musculoskeletal immaturity, characterized by delayed cuboidal bone development, a large head, silky hair coat, floppy ears and mandibular brachygnathia. Determination and interpretation of either growth hormone assays or thyroid hormone function is not entirely developed or understood in the equine, hence the importance of clinical diagnosis. Efforts towards characterizing thyroid function and growth hormone levels should be undertaken to prevent overdiagnosing this condition. A nitrate toxicity theory has been confirmed in certain foals born with "congenital hypothyroid syndrome". "
Below is a PDF file that you can open that lists in general terms and descriptions different types of dwarfisms in humans. It is very strait forward, so you should be able to read and distinguish the descriptions between the many types of dwarfisms.
BTW, Achondroplasia and other similar types of dwarfism are referred to as DISPROPORTIONATE dwarfism. These are the types I am researching and comparing to the Miniatures due to the physical similarities in which they manifest themselves.
I want to again try to explain my opinion, I strongly feel these types of dwarfisms I am working on are genetic in nature and NOT environmentally induced. The chances of a specific toxin in the environment, be at toxic levels ALL OVER THE WORLD, to produce this high number of dwarfisms is very scientifically unrealistic. If nitrates were that toxic all over the world you would see MASSIVE congenital malformations and deaths from numerous other animals including humans, not just our little Miniature horses.
BTW nitrate toxicity is relatively a low-level toxin to horses when compared to sheep and cattle, due to the different digestive tracts, ruminants vs monogastrics, meaning it takes a higher level to affect horses than it does cattle or sheep. However, horses are more susceptible to nitrate poisoning than other monogastric animals due to the cecum. Below is a website about pollutants and ground water, where this info above came from.
I have done quite extensive searches for anything reported or documented, describing any type of birth defects from Nitrate poisoning that mimic DISPROPORTIONATE dwarfism. I have yet to find any. If you have any information describing any credible documentation with pictures or physical descriptions of horses being born with disproportionate dwarf characteristics from nitrate poisoning, I would really appreciate you sending it to me.
John
Nitrates again
Nov. 12 2007
Question
Below is a link to an article written that gives a slightly
different description of the affected foals with congenital
hypothyroidism due to Nitrates. This article describes them
with an underbite. And also notes references. Does this
sound disproportionate? Thank you for taking your valuable
time to help us all learn more about dwarfism.
Congenital Hypothyroidism in Foals
Judy
Judy Zachary
Zachary Farms
Answer
I think you need to refer to my last thread about nitrates
and review the websites I refer to for explanations on
disproportionate dwarfism.
Ok so now someone says it causes underbites as well, that is not surprising, since the toxin is affecting the abnormal growth and development of the mandible. The foals still do not have a severe domed head, shortened and malformed long bones of the legs. All of those photos are of big horse foals with normal length to their leg bones, the only mini is the little black Miniature foal. It looks normal and it is saying it is immature?????? Immature to what? a large horse foal?? They show no comparison of another Miniature foal that is "mature". I will say his ears sure are not "floppy", they came up for the photo. I have yet to see a Miniature dwarf of the types I study to show any of these symptoms only and nothing else. All of mine show very abnormal leg bone growth as well as hip, spine, jaw, and head malformations, etc.
Unless I am blind I do not read anything that states that this is causing disproportionate dwarfism to the long bones of the foal's body or that it even causes any malformations of the head other than to the mandible causing an underbite.
Underbite is a known inheritable genetic defect as well, totally on it own with no other malformations to the foal. If you look in any equine conformation handbook or breeding reference manual they clearly state that underbite or "monkeymouth" is an inheritable genetic trait that is undesired regardless of anything in the environment or other genetic or congenital defect that could cause it as well.
What if the underbite wasn't due to the toxicity but was a genetic defect the foal inherited, are they sure it is only due to nitrates. All of the other nitrate toxicity documents I have read all refer to parrot mouth as one of the signature characteristics
If you go to the bottom of the pdf. You will see this hyperlink below to the thesis paper of the reference Dr. Andy Allen. In this paper it very clearly states the region of the country Western Canada, Western Ontario, and Northwestern US, that are shown to be affected. They do not state this is occurring all over the world in mass.
http://library2.usas...0212004-000356/
He clearly states the variables involved and that this was a case-controlled study, i.e., these mares and foals were Guinea pigs for this experiment, and were fed a very high level of nitrates. I can make just about anything I want to happen congenitally with any given experiment of a specific toxin. This was an experiment, this was not an out in the field study of what is really going on. They clearly state that certain examples were seen in that region of the countries and they suspected nitrates as the cause of certain congenital deformities, so they did an experiment to show what nitrates can do.
It is starting to sound as if some of you are taking a known toxin and its effects on fetal growth and blanket applying it to any abnormality you see in the Miniatures, genetic or not. I dont get it. I am not saying there are no cases of hypothyroidism in the minis, on the contrary I know it exists, as it does in other horse breeds. And I am not saying that there arent any cases of Nitrate toxicity in Miniatures, on the contrary I am sure it has and will happen, but to blame everything wrong conformationally, congenitally or genetically in the minis on Nitrates is really not thinking things with a rational, critical mind. Are we going to blame all of the dystocias and foaling problems in the Miniatures all over the world on Nitrates too, and ignore their size as probably THE major factor??
I know of other toxins, drugs, etc., that can cause similar physical characteristics that are shown on that pdf. I just dont see how you CANNOT distinguish between characteristics of different diseases whether genetic, congenital or environmentally induced. There are differences in their etiology I will not go into here about all three. I would be literally writing a book.
I am not belittling this toxin, I just do not see a single glaring similarity other than a slight under bite in one photo, the head is even normal in shape, and it is a large horse foal, not a mini. Dwarfs have numerous other characteristics that do not coincide with nitrate toxicity.
John
Dwarfism in combination with nitrates?
Nov. 12 2007
Question
I have had personal experience with congenital
hypothyroidism in horses, in both Morgans and Miniatures.
The first incidence was in 1991 with a Morgan filly. At that time little was known about what causes the condition. Research was in its very early stages, and at that time there was no idea at all that nitrates were the culprit. At that time, I talked with Dr. Andy Allen of WCVM in Saskatoon and he told me what he did know of the condition. Our Morgan filly did have a slight underbite at birth. She grew out of that in several weeks. There was absolutely nothing dwarfy about her otherwise; she was of normal size and proportion. Ears, nostrils, everything was normally sized & properly placed!
Our second experience was in 2004, with Miniatures, when we lost 50% of our foal crop--the foals died within an hour of birth. Both foals looked completely normal, but they were born very weak & died without ever getting up. They just faded away. That same year another Mini breeder also had a number of foal losses, due to the same cause. In both cases it was determined that there was an iodine deficiency, probably combined with a nitrate problem in the hay, in the mares. This other farm also had losses of weak foals, plus they had several dystocias and several foals that lived but had extremely weak legs. With time the weak legged foals did come right.
In 2004 I again talked with Dr. Andy Allen, and that is when I learned that he has come to suspect that nitrates are the root cause of congenital hypothyroidism. If the mineral balance is right the mare may be able to overcome the nitrates, but if the minerals are wrong the mare's system cannot compensate for the nitrates. We have since fixed our mineral imbalance.
In this general area there have been many farms that have suffered foal losses due to congenital hypothyroidism--most have been full size horses, of all breeds--QH, Morgan, TB, warmbloods. Symptoms seem to vary in severity (in terms of weak legs and immature joints) None of the breeders I have talked to have described any dwarfism symptoms in their affected foals. The last time I spoke with Dr. Allen I specifically asked him about the dwarf type deformities people on this board have described and said were associated with nitrates. He said he hadn't seen any such deformities in the foals he has studied--the "deformities" he described to me were the same as what I have seen personally and had described to me by other breeders in this area. Remember, the other Mini breeder that had this same trouble in 2004 did not have dwarfism symptoms either--the symptoms in her Mini foals were exactly the same as have been seen in the big horse foals in this area, and as described by Dr. Allen.
So, I have wondered, and this is my question...is it possible that with some Minis, where people are convinced that nitrates are to blame for the dwarfism that has shown up in some foals--is it possible that in some cases where the dwarf gene is already present the nitrates make the dwarf genes express themselves in a severe form, whereas without nitrates present it might have been a very minimal dwarf? I'm not saying all cases of Mini dwarfism, I'm just thinking that in instances where an owner insists that nitrates caused the dwarfism, because when the nitrate problem is corrected the dwarfism disappeared?
I'm not sure I'm expressing my question very well...I've just wondered if in Minis there's more than one factor at work in some instances--if nitrates can cause maximum expression of a dwarf gene that would ordinarily remain hidden or minimally expressed?
Thank you! (John, I'm very much enjoying reading your
replies to all of these posts!)
Mimimor
Holly
Cedar Plains Shetlands and Miniatures
Answer
Minimor,
Please read my post I just did to the thread Nitrates Again. I go into great length discussing Dr Allen's thesis paper with regards to hypothyroidism and its characteristics.
That said, your question IS very valid. Yes, there is a DEFINITE chance that Miniature horses born or raised in the affected areas and are carriers of the dwarf genes can have a dwarf affected by hypothyroidism from Nitrate toxicity and show characteristics of both diseases, one due to environment and one due to genetic inheritance. OF COURSE, THAT CAN HAPPEN. I APPLAUD you for having the resourcefulness to look into those things on your own, and critically examining the situation.
I have been adamant about my position because not a single person has yet to ask your intelligent question, every one of the questions posed so far have been to blanketly blame nitrates for the dwarfism regardless of the fact that the vast majority of the nitrate toxicity characteristics look nothing like the dwarfisms seen in this breed. One characteristic of one disease does not make it the same disease for something else with the same one characteristic.
I guess all people with club feet are dwarfs since that is a characteristic of some dwarfisms in humans. That doesn't sound rational to me.
Dwarfism inheritance and expression is independent of Nitrate toxicity, one can have both and one can have either or. What you would see are the characteristics of both expressed if you have a dwarf with nitrate toxicity and some things will be compounded in severity, BUT Nitrate toxicity in no way will make the dwarf gene show up more often in homozygous form to cause a dwarf. Apples and oranges, recessive diseased gene and environmental toxin.
For someone to not have a dwarf since fixing the nitrate problem, they either no longer have the carriers or they are having a great session of Russian Roulette so far, and their number isnt up yet again. The percentages are still there with the same horses to have a dwarf again regardless of Nitrate toxicity.
John
Well there is finally research being done.
Nov. 12 2007
Question
John, not sure if you will answer this?
How do you believe we can protect our breeding program, until the research is complete and hope for an answer?
Should we stop completely breeding two minis that have a dwarf? or just stop breeding that Stallion with that Mare? I do understand it takes both to produce a dwarf?
So, in my small herd that if my stallion and one of my mares produced a dwarf, I believe, I would sell the mare first and then think strong about gelding my stallion.
But if I have been breeding a stallion from young to old, and keep the same mares breeding year after year. & no dwarfs. That does not guarantee they are not carriers and show up in their offspring correct?
Thanks for the info a lot to take in and what is best for
the breed.
Wish you the best in your research.
Rebel
Mary
Kavelman
Kavelbel
Miniatures
Answer
Reble,
I had a nice rather long answer and I was kicked off and
lost it all, so I will try to answer you again from memory.
How do you believe we can protect our breeding program,
until the research is complete and hope for an answer?
Those are choices you will have to make, I am not in a
position to tell you what to do with your heard, those are
things that you will have the ultimate say. It would depend
on your size of operation and financially how involved you
are in the carriers and the risks.
Should we stop completely breeding two minis that have a
dwarf or just stop breeding that Stallion with that Mare?
Those are your horses, again, I do not have the right to
tell you what to do, Just as I would not want someone tell
me who I can or can't breed. Mare could be used with a
different stud that has not had a dwarf, but then again who
is going to be honest with you on that??
Your stud would depend on your size of program, invested monies, again, those are decisions only you can make, not me.
I do understand it takes both to produce a dwarf?
yes
So, in my small herd that if my stallion and one of my mares
produced a dwarf, I believe, I would sell the mare first and
then think strong about gelding my stallion.
Again, investment cost versus breeding program size, and
losses of foals that are dwarfs, all those play into
decisions by small and large operations.
But if I have been breeding a stallion from young to old,
and keep the same mares breeding year after year. & no
dwarfs. That does not guarantee they are not carriers and
show up in their offspring correct?
It depends on how many foals the stud has had and how many
mares that are carriers were bred to him. The more carriers
bred to him and no dwarf foals, the quicker you can
calculate his chances of being a non-carrier with a high
percentge.
John
To breed or not to breed that is the question.
Nov. 12 2007
Question
If what I am reading is correct no matter how many foals one
has that are non-dwarf out of a certain mare or by a certain
stallion there are no guarantees that the next one couldn't
be a dwarf is this correct? At what number do you consider
your herd or stallion or mare non-carrier. 5 foals 10, 50?
20 years?
3 years ago we had a mare who had a dwarf she came to us bred I was on the fence about breeding her back and my vet suggested to try my stallion with her so we did and she did not have a dwarf BUT she did have a foal born with no eyes which according to the vet was also genetic or a gestational development problem so we have not bred her since and I have taken her out of the brood mare band,
My question was this the right thing to do since she has had 2 problems back to back? Do you feel a mare should be taken out of the gene pool if she is a known carrier and if you don't think so could you give the reasons why not?
Backwoodsnanny
Nita
Maine Pride Miniatures
Answer
If you breed your stud to 25 or more known carrier mares of
one type (not guesses on looks), and no dwarfs of that type
are born then your percentages of that stallion not being a
carrier is in the mid to upper 90's percentage wise for him
not to be carrying the dwarf type that you are looking for.
Each dwarf type most likely is independent of the others, so
you would need to do that for the others as well to be
certain he is carrying none of the defective genes.
If you breed 100 mares that are carriers and no dwarfs you are in the 99.999...... % chance of not being a carrier, it is not linear, it is a curve to infinity basically.
Age is not a determinant, it is the number of unaffected offspring from specific mares.
As for the mare, the dwarfism yes that is a concern, the microphthalmia I am not as concerned, YET. There are some thoughts of it being genetic, the predisposition to have small eyes, there might be an environmental influence, do not know yet. Right now, it is thought to be congenital with unknown etiology. Haven't looked into it that much, yet, not much time to do side stuff.
I do have a microphthalmia miniature sample, from a foal, it died, and it is common to have other problems causing death.
So, to use her or not that would be your decision.
John
Breeding question
Nov. 12 2007
Question
If you breed a stallion and a mare and they produce a
dwarf..(so you know they both carriers, right?) then you
breed the stallion to ANOTHER mare and have a normal
foal..what
is the percentage possibility that the offspring is a
carrier? Thanks
littlesteppers
Christine
C&D's Little Steppers
Answer
"If you breed a stallion and a mare
..and
they produce a dwarf. (so
you know they both carriers, right?)"
Yes
"then you breed the stallion to ANOTHER mare and have a
normal
foal..what
is the
precentage
possibility that the offspring is a carrier?"
Depends on if the mother to the normal foal is a carrier. If
the mother to normal foal is a carrier then the foal has a
67% (2/3) that the foal is a carrier and 33% (1/3) chance
the foal is homozygous normal.
I hope you understand that if the foal is NOT a dwarf then you take out 25% of the chances you would before conception. So therefore, your calculations on the foal being a carrier only involve the 75% that are normal looking.
Now if the mother is a non-carrier, then the foal has 50% (1/2) chance of it being a carrier, and 50% (1/2) chance of it being homozygous normal. Because if the mare is NOT a carrier, then you will never have a dwarf with those two being crossed.
All of this assuming we are talking about only one type of dwarfism.
John
Pictures of Minimal Expression Dwarf?
Nov. 13 2007
Question
Here are the pictures for the horse I sent you the pedigree.
She has an underbite, club foot, long in the back (to me
anyway) and head is just not right. approx. 29" I have
always felt she was a minimal expression dwarf.
kaykay
Kay Baxter
Baxters
Painted Pasture
Answer
kaykay,
I looked at the pedigree, and looking at the mare, nothing
screams that she is recessive. That is far from saying she
is a non-carrier, she has a possibility of being a carrier.
Her Grand sire on the dam side never had a dwarf, but that
is 2 generations back, a lot of other genes are "in" your
mare, she only has
approx
25% of his genes. The other horses close in her pedigree I
do not know about.
Her conformation is not ideal. That has nothing to do with
dwarfism. Her underbite, I cannot determine in this manner
if her underbite is genetic or due to lack of care with
regards to her teeth. If it is genetic, it could be due to
dwarfism expressivity or it could be just that she has genes
for having an underbite. Don't confuse bad conformation or
independent inferior genes with dwarfism expressivity over
the dominant normal genes. In other words, some horses have
less than ideal conformation independent of possibly
carrying the dwarf gene. Clubfoot does not necessarily have
anything to do with dwarfism, I think I expressed that in
another thread. Clubfoot can have numerous causes including
lack of proper hoof care, or bad leg conformation,
independent of dwarfism influence. Yes, she is a little long
bodied for her leg length, but that again really has nothing
specific to do with dwarfism.
Sorry I wish I could give you answer more specific.
John
Height Reduction
Nov. 13 2007
Question
John, first of all thanks for being here and opening this
forum to questions.
I understand that dwarfism is not essentially about height, however - if I breed stallion A to mare B and have offspring smaller than both sire and dam, does that indicate the involvement of a dwarf gene, or is it just random height fluctuation? If you add to the equation the pretty but somewhat domed head and large eyes that we see often in this breed but assume a correct bite and no other dwarf features, does that affect your answer?
Thanks,
wildoak
Jan
Wildoak
Farm
Answer
"if I breed stallion A to mare B and have offspring smaller
than both sire and dam, does that indicate the involvement
of a dwarf gene, or is it just random height fluctuation? If
you add to the equation the pretty but somewhat domed head
and large eyes that we see often in this breed but assume a
correct bite and no other dwarf features, does that affect
your answer? "
You are correct, height has a high rate of variability with
respect to carriers just as it does with non-carriers. If a
foal is born to 2 parents and ends up being smaller than
both, I would be curious about that but you would need to
look at other offspring of both of those parents,
ie
does the stallion have a majority of small foals with less
influence from the dams. Does the mare always have foals
smaller than her, etc. Those questions do not help you rule
out the foal being recessive completely, but you could look
at it as if the majority of the stallion's foals are small
then you would look at the smaller height as normal genetic
variance and not due to a recessive dwarf gene the foal has
inherited. Same thing for the mare. The head is something
that is so variable, I do not rule by it. Exotic head with a
pedigree that is known to have dwarfs, that is a concern.
John
Minimal Dwarf Question
Nov. 13 2007
Question
I have a filly here, well she is two now. Anyways she was born
with a straight on bite and looked good. She developed and
underbite and is clubby on all four feet. I got her angles back
to near normal so she looks better. But her legs are funky so
she always wears her hooves down odd. Anyways my question is
this. How do you determine minimal dwarf vs. really bad
conformation? IF that makes sense. If not feel free to ask
questions and I will get back to you asap.
Gizmoe
Answer
Sounds like with the mouth that she developed hooks, it does not
sound like anything that is definitely genetic only. When was
the last time she had her teeth floated or caps pulled?? She is
two now she should be shedding her front incisor caps, though I
am NOT an equine dentist. Club feet in and of itself is not a
characteristic of dwarfism, I said that in 2 other threads. The
sheer fact she has club feet in all four screams bad leg
conformation, in the pastern there are two major bones the first
and second phalanx, which either could be too short, misshaped
causing the clubfeet to occur. This is totally different than
dwarfism. You can have bad conformation and not be carrying any
dwarf gene. I can't go on much with just what you told me other
than bad conformation, sorry.
John
Are dwarf carriers less prevalent in some miniature horse
lines?
Nov. 13 2007
Question
John, thank you for taking the time to share your knowledge
and research with all of us.
The majority of horses in my breeding program are Gold
Melody Boy or Orion Light Van
Huttenest
bred with a sprinkling of
Jandts,
Eygption
King, and Blue Boy mixed in. I have never had a dwarf foal
but haven't been breeding for that long of a time. Am I just
lucky or are there some lines of mini's that are at less
risk for producing dwarf foals or carrier foals and if so
can you tell us which ones?
Thanks,
Angelheart
Maryann
Answer
Maryann
I can't answer that, I cannot tell you specific bloodlines,
I am in the middle of my work, I would be accusing a line of
something with no scientific proof to back it up. I will
only say that there is a very good possibility no one is
free from the types I have seen.
John
Minimal
Dwarf ?
Nov. 16 2007
Question
Thank you, John, for sharing your knowledge on dwarf
miniatures & your commitment to find the answers. It would
be wonderful to have a test for the dwarf gene.
Question ~ If you have a stallion or mare that produces a minimal dwarf are they likely to produce the typical dwarf with the bad bite, large head and crooked legs? Where can we find more information on the "types" of dwarf genes?
Thank you for taking so much of
your time
to answer all of our many questions. We can all benefit from
your knowledge to improve the miniature horse.
Nancy G
Nancy Goshorn
Galloping G Miniatures
Answer
~ If you have a stallion or mare that produces a minimal
dwarf are they likely to produce the typical dwarf with the
bad bite, large head and crooked legs?
Where can we find more information on the "types" of dwarf
genes?
To try to bring some rational understanding to this subject
about "minimal dwarfs", I feel I need to comment about the
term, what it means and its use.
First of all, the term "minimal dwarf" is totally a made-up
term by someone somewhere that wanted to say that a horse
that wasn't a dwarf but looked like one was a "minimal
dwarf", or wanted to say that a true dwarf that was
minimally affected (ie
a good dwarf) was a "minimal dwarf". So needless to say, the
term has been widely used for a wide variety of "good
dwarfs" or "horses with really bad conformation" or "a horse
that had an extremely exotic head, bad legs, and really
small in height". Any way you look at it, the term has been
used to try to describe a wide variety of horses with "some
sort of problem." So, with that said, I strongly feel the
term is incorrect and it is used improperly to describe
certain horses.
If you have a dwarf that is "a good dwarf" in the sense that
it has the disease but it is not as severe in showing its
characteristics, then you have a dwarf with two homozygous
recessive genes showing less gene expression than might be
typically seen. Your dwarf is no less of a dwarf than
someone else's dwarf that might be more severely affected by
its genes' expression of the disease.
Unless you are looking at two different types of dwarfism,
then you can't compare at all, because the pathology of the
two diseases are different.
If you have a very small horse with an exotic head, bad
legs, and maybe other conformational faults, how can you say
the horse is a minimal dwarf?? Don't you think it is
possible to have all of those characteristics and NOT be a
dwarf, (especially in this breed). That is not to say the
horse is not possibly a carrier. If that IS the case, which
you don't know until it produces one, then you have a
carrier that is having expressivity of a recessive gene
competing with the dominant gene. BUT, the horse is NOT a
dwarf in having the characteristics of the disease. I have
personally seen "really good dwarfs" and horses with
expressivity of a recessive dwarf gene look very similar.
So, until there is some real information to categorize these
horses with certain traits and variances, I recommend to
everyone not to use the term so loosely.
So, to answer your question in a lengthy way, I do not know
if the "minimal dwarf" a stallion and a mare have is
actually a minimal dwarf and not a really bad horse, I don't
have pics to see. I have seen thousands of pics of various
horses over the years. I have learned to "see" certain
characteristics of horses that might be expressivity of a
recessive dwarf gene. But that does not mean the horse is a
"minimal dwarf", it is no such thing. A horse with small
size and an underbite does NOT classify the horse as a
"minimal dwarf". An underbite is a deleterious trait all its
own, without dwarfism causing it. Crooked legs on a small
horse does not mean it is a minimal dwarf, crooked legs are
in every horse breed. Our breed sees more of them because
the size of the horse is not 1500 lbs. A large horse foal or
yearling with severely crooked legs gets put down, we seem
to let it go try to "fix it" and keep those alive, not
because it is trying to be caring or that we try to breed
for it. But, because of their small size they CAN still
walk, run and breed, we keep perpetuating certain
deleterious characteristics that are getting confused with
dwarfism.
So, I cannot tell you anything about if a stallion or mare
that produces what might or might not be a dwarf, that
actually later produce a dwarf. They probably have a
possibility. I do not know the quality of the stallion or
mare, I do not know the characteristics of the "minimal
dwarf". So, when you give me very limited information I have
to qualify my answer. I wish I could be clearer and not this
vague but I can't.
I can't really give much information over the internet about
my work or the types with pictures or possible candidate
gene homologies, with all that I have done, and the limited
amount of work one person can get done in a lab at any given
time, a large biotech lab could easily get the info and
dedicate an entire group to it and scoop all my work, get
the answers and get it out, and all my work since 1993 is
gone, and I
dont
have a thesis to defend. I present my work to certain groups
with enough information to grasp the enormity of my
undertaking and try to help them understand what we as
breeders can do now to try and breed better horses until
some answers are known.
John
Research facilities
Nov. 19 2007
Question
John, I commend you for taking on this monumental task of
researching & trying to isolate the Dwarf gene.
My question is... Are there any other organizations who are
researching Dwarfism, or who have shown an interest in
researching Dwarfism, who might benefit from your research?
I fully well, understand why you would want to "protect"
your work until it is published. But, it has occurred to me
that a big research facility may be able to get more funding
& have a number of researchers working on this enabling them
to come up with answers much sooner than one person can. Or,
is this something that Equine Research just don't feel
deserves the time, money & effort?
Dona
Dona
Neargartner
Kickapoo Acres
Answer
No research facility whether private or connected with a
school is going to do any research on something like this
unless they know they can make money on it or recognition
for its discovery. That does not even mention the money
these labs would want to cover costs for that research, or
all the samples that would need to be donated, because they
are not getting mine!
I don't think you realize no research is done in these facilities for free. Who do you think pays for all of the costs???? It is paid for by the people that want the answers. The facilities ask for donations whether public or private, grants, government funding etc, the facilitiy does NOT pay for it out of their own pocket. Why do you think there are telethons on TV for certain human diseases??? Special colored ribbon fund raisers, ie breast cancer. There is not a research firm out there with Billions of money in the bank waiting to spend it on some research of some disease in the CHANCE they could profit from it. Someone else is going to take the financial responsibility and risk NOT the research firm.
Also, there is no one in this breed knocking research facilities doors down with money wanting this work done and answers to this problem. I don't see the members of either registry jumping up and down with large amounts of money in hand willing to give it to any research facility. And large amounts meaning 10s of thousands closer to 100s of thousands of dollars, not a couple thousand that has been donated to UK or TAMU. The amount donated so far will pay for about 10 primer sets of potential microsatellite or gene sequences, that is, it. That doesn't include the other chemicals needed to even use them, or the machine run time to analyze the results, and those primers are NOT the genes with the answers to the dwarfism, very simply primers are things used to amplify or read DNA.
Right now, there is another student in my lab working on a color gene to try and find it and make a test. It is very hush hush, why, because of potential that some other lab will beat this lab to the answer and the potential of recognition and money. Infact I have donated some Mini samples to be in this research that I feel are a specific color. I have also donated some samples when the research was being done for the Silver dapple gene for non-breed specific confirmation of the test.
I have spent a very long time with my work, I know the pedigrees and its problems, I know the breed history, I know the different types of dwarfs seen, I have the samples. This is my work, I am not going to give up all my work to give it to some lab that only cares about making money on the results and not what all comes with those results, meaning what does this breed do with the answers. I for one appreciate those concerns. No lab with making money on their mind is going to care at all. Anyways, no lab is interested, if they were they would be knocking on our door. We have not shown that there is any money in it to be made.
Now that I am here at Gluck I am involved in a lot of potential things that will help me find the answers, things I can't disclose due to confidentiality with genetic software developers to be part of pilot studies and this is ONLY because of my samples that I have and how knowledgeable I am about the breed. Gluck is relying on it for some really big applications in research. I just can't say anything. That is why I haven't said anything someone would get their hopes up if the pilot project doesn't find anything.
Remember we are not talking about humans we are talking about horses, pets, and the genetic diseases we see in them. Horses are something of a side note in the overall picture of genetic research since mice and other lab animals are much more suited for genetic research that can influence the work done in humans. And in the overall picture of horse genetic research, we as the Miniature breed are considered a fly on the butt of the horse in most (but not all) research labs that work in equine genetics only.
So, I really think some Miniature people think we as a breed have a bigger influence than we really do. We do not have any million-dollar races, we do not have any million-dollar titles. We do not have even any 50,000-dollar awards, ie futurity or performance related awards, but there many other money driven breeds that exist that do, and they are the ones getting looked at by research labs much more than us.
John
More Articles - Environmental Deformities
Nov. 19 2007
Question
You said in your reply to my original question
(Environmental Birth Defects That Mimic Dwarfism???) that
you would be interested in seeing more articles. I was able
to find a few more papers that gave some details about
environmental deformities. I have not had a foal that I
think had 'environmental deformities' vs 'dwarfism', so my
interest is in knowing how to tell the differences should I
have a foal with dwarf/dwarf-like feature. If it is
environmental, then I would approach the problem from a
completely different angle than if I was dealing with the
dwarf gene.
Just a note, the article you quoted in answer to my initial question, is the ONLY one that I have found that talks about "mandibular brachygnathia" (parrot mouth/over-bite) being associated with the environmental syndromes. ALL of the other references talk about "mandibular prognathism" which is the undershot jaw/underbite which is a common trait in a dwarf foal.
The articles also talk about domed heads and hydrocephalus. Hydrocephalus can cause a domed head. Here are definitions of hydrocephalus in cattle, the first two sound very much like a description of a dwarf head...
hydrocephalus - There are three forms that occur in cattle: in one there is gross distention of the cranium with normal facial bones; in the second there is a similar enlargement of the cranium with an accompanying achondroplastic dishing of the face and foreshortening of the maxilla and a shortening of the limb bones these are the classical bulldog calves; in the third the cranium is normal in size but there is internal hydrocephalus and the calves are blind and imbecile.
Nearly all the articles talk about deformed legs and joints and contracted tendons. Several of the dwarves that I have seen have had twisted limbs and contracted joints. The articles don't really mention disproportionality of the limbs as a symptom, just deformity. But, from your descriptions of the dwarf types, it is only in type 2 dwarves that you would expect to see disproportionate legs manifested by shortened forelimbs. So, lack of disproportion, doesn't rule out the environmental leg deformities mimicking dwarf characteristics, as not all types of dwarf have disproportionate legs at birth, some dwarves only have the deformed legs.
I guess from what I have been reading, I am still not seeing how a breeder can get a clear- cut idea of whether a foal with deformities that LOOK similar to those caused by genetic dwarfism is suffering from dwarfism or environmentally caused birth defects. What specifically will a person see that is different? Unfortunately, there were basically no photos to go with the articles, so it is hard to picture the differences that exist, or if the differences are indeed easy to tell apart. I am hoping that you can give a good description of how the two are different.
Anyway, here are the additional articles that I found. I will give the website address and then a short excerpt that mentions the specific deformities that seem to be in common between environmental deformities and true genetic dwarfism
Signs of Hypothyroidism in foals
Weak at birth and often not full-term
Poor sucking and righting reflexes
Lack of coordination
hypothermia
Long coat
Respiratory problems
Stunted growth
Developmental bone and muscle problems, such as undershot jaw and bent legs
Early death
Hypothyroidism in Foals Tissues were received from a nine day-old non-viable Quarter horse foal that died following a short illness. On microscopic examination, sever goiter (thyroid hyperplasia) was diagnosed on section of thyroid tissue and, within the heart muscle, there were areas of acute degeneration and mineralization consistent with a nutritional cardiomyopathy. No leg or joint abnormalities were observed, although madibular prognathism (lengthening of the bottom jaw or mandible relative to the upper jaw), was observed.
Thyroid hyperplasia and musculoskeletal deformity (TH-MSD), a syndrome of neonatal foals well recognized in western Canada (4), where it is considered an important cause of foal mortality and reproductive loss (5), has not been commonly reported in eastern Canada. The musculoskeletal deformities observed include flexural deformities of the limbs, muscular weakness, mandibular prognathism, and doming of the head. There was pronounced mandibular prognathism* (*note - this is an underbite)
It is characterized by foals being born weak or dead with
contracted tendons and a deformed jaw (elongated lower or
shortened upper)
The following Q and A was published in Western Horse Review
Feb. 2007
--------------------------------
Q. A friend of mine just lost a foal; it was still born and had a palate deformity. Her veterinarian asked her if the mare had been turned out on green feed in the fall. Why would she have asked that question? I am interested because my own horses are turned onto barley fields after harvest.
A. Mike Scott, a veterinarian with Moore and Company, Calgary Alberta, provided his insights on this subject:
Your question doesn't have an easy answer. Your friend's veterinarian was likely curious about the mare's exposure to green feed because of an ongoing study being conducted by the Western College of Veterinary Medicine into something called Congenital Hypothyroidism and Dysmaturity Syndrome. I happened to be one of the researchers involved in looking into this Syndrome in 1994-95. The Syndrome, which is specific to western Canada, has been recognized since the late '70s. It is characterized by foals being born weak or dead with contracted tendons and a deformed jaw (elongated lower or shortened upper) - both signs of skeletal immaturity that are a result of malformation of the thyroid gland or lack of thyroid function. An extensive survey conducted by the WCVM of western Canadian horse breeders into the management of broodmares and breeding herds led researchers to conclude that the common denominator in the occurrence of CHDS was the feeding of green feed to mares during pregnancy. Green feed, if cut during a period when the crop is stressed by frost or drought, can have a high nitrate content. Consumption of water with high nitrate content in third world countries has been shown to result in thyroid diseases in people; it seemed likely that high nitrate in green feed could cause similar thyroid problems in horses. However, further testing involving feeding pregnant mares green feed with high nitrate content failed to prove the theory. Still, it is possible that a relationship exists between a mare eating green feed and the type of foaling problem experienced by your friend. Research into CHDS is still being done at the WCVM, spearheaded by Andy Allen. So, while there is no definite conclusion that can be drawn about why your friend lost her foal, her vet's interest in a green feed connection probably relates to this study.
-----------------------------------
http://animalag.wsu.edu/newsletters/CWAATQrtrlyNwsltrfeb07.pdf
and the birth of foals that commonly have mandibular
prognathism, the fine skin and soft silky haircoat of
premature foals even though they are over term, incomplete
ossification of the cuboidal bones of the limbs, flexural
deformities of the forelimbs, and commonly ruptured digital
extensors. Some have hydrocephalus and some patent urachus.
R3
Julie Miller
R3 Minis – Fletcher Oklahoma
Answer
I get the feeling you really feel that the dwarfism we have
in the Miniatures is caused solely on hypothyroidism due to
environmental causes, like nitrate levels or iodine. I
really don't think whatever I say will change that, so all I
will do is comment on my opinion of the article you
presented anything else I say will not be of any consequence
to your opinion
As for hydrocephalus it is caused by water on the brain. Of course, it will make a head domed, but again what does that have to do with an inherited disease that has a consistent type all over the world. Some dwarfisms in humans have hydrocephalic characteristics, so what, I think you are getting confused as to what I was commenting about from the original thread. Oh, and bulldog calves from dexter cattle have a test for that dwarfism, and it is inherited as an autosomal recessive with carriers that are smaller than normal non-carriers, with carriers showing disproportionate legs to body but do not show the disease which is lethal in homozygous form.
A quote from your first article listed
"In the past, the thyroid gland has been blamed for more than its fair share of problems. But the latest technology and improved blood tests indicate that true thyroid disease in horses is quite rare, and ensuring the right levels of iodine in your horse's diet can prevent most problems."
The second would not open
But from what I could read, I guess you are getting confused with hypothyroidism and dwarfism, since there was no dwarf disproportionate leg or body characteristics. There are many diseases that have one or two symptomatic characteristics or more with dwarfism, again one horse, not a dozen or so or hundreds all over the world in various environments
About the third article
This article was on 1 (0NE) foal not even a dozen or even 100, but one foal. I can't tell you how many things or various degrees of exposure can cause congenital malformations in only one animal in only one species, there are probably millions of examples. In other words, there are billions of things randomly that can happen all over the world, and there are things that can happen that look like an inherited disease that occurs by chance and not due to a dwarf gene, this foal looks like one of those examples.
A quote from your third article listed
"The etiology of this disease is highly debated. Poor nutritional management of the mare appears to be the most likely cause in most cases. Pregnant mares fed diets that contain high levels of nitrate or that are iodine deficient have been associated with an increased risk of producing an affected foal (4). Also, the presence of fungal toxins in the diet of pregnant mares has been associated with congenital thyroid hypoplasia (9).
In this case, the mare was fed a diet of moderate quality hay and oats throughout gestation, with no mineral supplementation or access to pasture. The mare may have been iodine deficient due to the lack of mineral supplementation, the hay may have contained nitrate, or both. Nitrate is more likely to be present in green feed (immature cereal crops). Forage grown under stressed conditions, such as dry weather, has an increased probability of containing nitrate (10). The summer of 2001 was very dry in southwestern Ontario, which may have resulted in an increased nitrate level in some Ontario forages. The forage grown during the summer of 2001 would have been fed during the latter two-thirds of gestation to mares that were bred late in the season (May and June 2001). The equine fetal thyroid gland becomes active by the 4th or 5th mo of gestation (2) and may be most susceptible to insult from poor nutritional conditions in the early to middle part of gestation.
The dry summer of 2001, combined with lack of mineral supplementation, may have predisposed some late-bred mares in Ontario to produce hypothyroid offspring in the spring and summer of 2002. However, it is important to note that there are other potential sources of nitrate, including contaminated drinking water and irrigated pastures. Further investigations should be conducted regarding the prevalence and etiology of TH-MSD in foals in Ontario to increase awareness of this disease."
I don't see how this can explain all of the dwarf Miniatures all over the World in different environments.
As to answer your fourth article, if he was one of the researchers that published with Dr. Allen then they should talk because DR. Allen's work is getting used as reference with one of the symptoms as "mandibular brachygnathia" that is seen. So, there are either typos which is likely and or more likely variable characteristics of both parrot and monkey mouthed seen which would not surprise me in the least, since they explain how the hypothyroidism is affecting the growth of the head.
A quote below from the fourth says how regional it was.
"I happened to be one of the researchers involved in looking into this Syndrome in 1994-95. The Syndrome, which is specific to western Canada, has been recognized since the late '70s."
In your fifth article all I found was this, it was not what
you quoted but I think you are referring to the same thing.
Again, what does this have to do with dwarfs seen in
Australia, New Zealand, Europe or US that have not been
exposed to the mustard plant, or for that matter, since
these foals have to be put down right away or die early, how
does that explain adult dwarfs that are five or ten years
old.
Congenital Hypothyroid Dysmaturity Syndrome
This syndrome with a whopper of a name applies only to foals. An affected mare may have an abnormally long pregnancy, abort or give birth to an abnormal foal. Affected foals often have an abnormal jaw, immature hair coat, fine skin, poorly-calcified hock and knee bones, abnormal curvatures of the front legs, congenitally-ruptured tendons and other abnormalities. Most effected foals die or need to be euthanized. The cause of this disease is believed to be the ingestion of late winter/early spring weeds by mares during late pregnancy. Mustards and other members of the Brassica family are believed to be the main culprits. Chemical compounds in these plants seem to have goitrogenic (thyroid-stimulating) effects, even though the foals are not born with goiters. The risk factor is present in both fresh and dried plants, so weedy hay is also, a concern. Nitrates may also be involved in this syndrome, but that is under investigation. Horse owners should feed weed-free hay to pregnant horses and keep these animals out of weedy areas until after foaling. Mares that have foaled one affected foal are at higher risk to do so again, perhaps because of a behavioral component that involves preferential eating of the toxic weeds.
I really think I have beat a dead horse for the last time.
John
Question on breathing issues as well as Downs syndrome in
horses/dwarves??
Nov. 19 2007
Question
Hi John,
As most know I did have a dwarf born at our farm .. she was not only a dwarf but born very premature so her lasting as long as she did was nothing short of a miracle.
We lost her and it happened pretty quick she was just over a year old and had some raspy breathing one morning. We did have a virus running thru here so I thought that was it but within a couple of hours she could barely breath. We got to vet where they pulled blood and it was literally almost black.. they x-rayed her and found (I will try to get this right) that her soft palate basically due to the shape of her head grew to the point that it was covering her trachea and was choking her. We had to put her down.
I know a couple others on the forum who have had dwarfs would write that they were having breathing issues that seemed to come on suddenly and had to be put down for the same thing.
Is this something that is a more common
then
not cause of death in dwarves I have also found and I am
sure some are going to misunderstand me but the dwarves that
I have known in person had a much different personality then
other horses the only way I can describe it but they are
almost like children with downs syndrome in personality- is
this a normal or something that you have found to be
consistent in dwarfs or is there such a thing as a horse
form of downs syndrome that could be a common link in
dwarves.
Lisa-Ruff N Tuff Minis_*
Lisa Andrade
Ruff N Tuff Miniature Horses –Nampa Idaho
Answer
Lisa,
Something like that is seen in human dwarfs with certain
types of dwarfism. ACH has the Magnum Foramen problem in
humans, which causes breathing problems in the human dwarfs
and can cause death if not surgically corrected.
This breathing problem I have seen as a common characteristic in certain Mini dwarf types. Dwarf horses do have personalities that sometimes are unusual but I think a lot of that stems from the way they are cared for, by meaning having a lot of human only interaction, therefore learning body language skills of humans, etc versus horses because they are not usually with alot of horses. I will say I have seen some dwarfs that were mostly kept with other small minis and did not have that much human contact and about the same as the other normal horses and the dwarf was very horse not human in its actions and personality.
As for Downs Syndrome, that in humans is caused by trisomy 21 of the human 21 chromosome. The 21 chromosomes of the horse do not carry the same information and I do not know of a specific trisomy 21 in the horse that was documented as even alive or functional, I would have to look that up. Horses have a different number of chromosomes than the human with the genes being on different chromosomes you are dealing with apples and oranges.
John
Outcrossing on Shetlands
Nov. 26 2007
Question
Hi John,
Thanks so much for answering questions! This is all very
enlightening. I'm not sure if I can word this correctly
hopefully it's not too confusing. I found it interesting in
several of your posts that you had said that you had never
seen dwarfism in purebred Shetlands (and
other
pony breeds you mentioned). By outcrossing more with
Shetlands would this gradually reduce the carriers produced
since that gene is not coming from one of the two parents
each time? If you were to heavily out cross over several
generations would you likely eliminate the dwarf gene in
that line all together?
If so this "fad" (as many like to call it) of ASPC/AMHR
horses could only be GOOD for our, lack of better words,
"breed".
Thanks,
Hillary
Boinky
Sport Horses, Miniatures - Berea, KY
Answer
By introducing horses (ponies of any breed) with genetics
that are not, you can gradually decrease the percentage of
resulting carriers, but it would take quite some time. For
one you do not know which foals from the crosses are
non-carriers and which are carriers, only
breding
and getting a dwarf would distinguish that. Using the ponies
as outcrosses does not solve the problem short term or even
long term genetically for well conformed desired horses that
are still carriers of the recessive gene, because those
individuals would still carry those genes on to their
offspring and later generations. What was done decades ago
in the Hereford and Angus cattle breeds was the carriers of
the recessive dwarf gene were slaughtered as soon as they
produced a dwarf. That very quickly removed a large portion
of the dwarf gene carriers. Thereby it was pretty much
eradicated by slaughter and got meat market money for the
carriers rather than trying to find a common physical trait
and solely basing the carriers on that trait, (this was
before animal genetic research testing was common). We in
the horse industry
dont
have that option at all.
So, to answer your question as easy as possible, adding pony breeds to the gene pool will help dilute the number of carriers within our "breed" over the long term and make the dwarf genes less common within the gene pool therefore causing less dwarfs to be born. However, it will not eradicate the dwarf genes from the total gene pool within our "breed".
John
Does this guy look like a dwarf?
Nov. 26 2007
Question
Hi, I had resolved several months ago that this little
guy is a "minimal dwarf". After reading your responses
on that subject it made me wonder. Is he really a dwarf
or just a poorly conformed little guy? He was 16" at
birth and very normal in appearance, however he was lax
in the tendons and long in the toes.
By 3 mos. his bite went off. (Underbite). His heel on his left front foot started to roll. Our farrier (new and learning) did the best he knew to do. As of last month, the bone in the ankle is actually crushed. We're working with a surgeon and farrier at UF to straighten him as much as possible. I wish I had known to get him there sooner. We go back next week to check his progress. As of last night, he is 25" tall.
The photos are taken at around a few days with his mother to 1 1/2 mos., again at 3-4 mos. and the last around 8 1/2 mos. He foaled 2-11-07. I'm curious to hear your take on him. I can send you his bloodlines. http://www.lilbeginnings.com/miniature-horse-facts-and-information/Candace-Forhofer-Farm-Fla-dwarf-webinar-2007.jpg
Thank you so much for your time,
Candice
Forthofer
Farm – Lake Placid Florida
Answer
Candice,
From the pics you provided, I can say that the colt does
not have any glaring characteristics that he is a
"dwarf" of any type. HOWEVER, I can say that from
looking at the mother and looking at him I would say
that he is not of ideal conformation, bluntly he is not
a good quality horse with regards to conformation. If I
could look at his pedigree I could give you an idea if
he has a chance of being a carrier, but even without
that looking at the pedigree I very suspect that he is a
carrier of recessive genetics you don't want. He has
conformational faults he is expressing that I believe
are things you want to stay away from as well. Again,
though this is only my opinion based on my experiences
with this bred and my research.
John
Environmental Defects VS. Dwarfism - How to Tell???
Nov. 26 2007
Question
I am sorry that in my previous posts I did not frame my
questions in a clear enough manner, as you still have
not answered the questions I asked. And, I am sorry that
you feel like you are beating a dead horse, but I think
that is because you keep reiterating facts that I have
not disputed, rather than answering the questions. I am
not trying to imply that environment is causing dwarves
all over the world. I am not trying to imply that
nitrate poisoning or hyperthyroidism is causing dwarves.
Please reread my posts; I have NEVER contended that
environmental factors cause dwarfism. I fully understand
that ENVIRONMENT DOES NOT CAUSE DWARVES.
Both of my posts have been asking whether or not environmental factors can disrupt fetal development and cause birth defects that to the untrained eye LOOK LIKE, but ARE NOT caused by the dwarf gene. The second part is HOW TO TELL THE DIFFERENCE between dwarf foals and foals with environmentally caused (not genetically caused by dwarfism) birth defects. That is ALL I have been asking. I don't know how I can ask this anymore plainly.
Do you acknowledge that ENVIRONMENT CAN CAUSE BIRTH DEFECTS (not dwarfism)? And, do you acknowledge that some of those defects are traits that may LOOK SIMILAR TO SOME DWARFISM TRAITS?
I don't know the numbers, but I would suppose that it is entirely possible that environmental defects account for less than 1% of deformed miniature foals, and that dwarfism is the cause of the other 99+%. However, the percentages are immaterial to my question (although it would be interesting if that number is known), as what I want to know about is my potential foal that isn't 'normal' when it is born.
If I have a foal that is born with a domed head, bent legs, and a protruding lower jaw, how can I tell if the foal is a dwarf (genetic condition, unrelated to environment) OR if it has developmental deformities due to environment (not cause by dwarfism)? Please point out the differences so I can understand them.
THAT IS ALL I WANT TO KNOW.
Thank you.
R3
R3 Minis Fletcher Oklahoma
Answer
R3,
Your articles that you have provided with your questions and your stance on this subject early on was aimed at explaining the reasons for the malformations seen in Miniatures is due to environmental causes not an inherited gene or genes.
Your recent questions below and my quoted answers I have already provided in multiple different threads to you and others.
"Both of my posts have been asking whether or not environmental factors can disrupt fetal development and cause birth defects that to the untrained eye LOOK LIKE, but ARE NOT caused by the dwarf gene."
"Do you acknowledge that ENVIRONMENT CAN CAUSE BIRTH DEFECTS (not dwarfism)? And, do you acknowledge that some of those defects are traits that may LOOK SIMILAR TO SOME DWARFISM TRAITS?"
My answers are:
Of course, I do, I have always stated those things
happen, and they happen all over the world. It is a very
well-known scientific fact that the environment and its
problems can cause developmental (or congenital) defects
in all life forms including plants. And these defects
can have SOME characteristics of other genetically
inherited diseases, namely dwarfisms.
Quote from one of my answers to you on Nov 19
"I can't tell you how many things or various degrees of exposure can cause congenital malformations in only one animal in only one species, there are probably millions of examples.. In other words, there are billions of things randomly that can happen all over the world, and there are things that can happen that look like an inherited disease that occurs by chance and not due to a dwarf gene, this foal looks like one of those examples."
Some of my other answers from your Nov 11 questions. With regards to my stance on environment causing birth defects.
"I want to again try to explain my opinion, I strongly feel these types of dwarfisms I am working on are genetic in nature and NOT environmentally induced. The chances of a specific toxin in the environment, be at toxic levels ALL OVER THE WORLD, to produce this high number of dwarfisms is very scientifically unrealistic. If nitrates were that toxic all over the world you would see MASSIVE congenital malformations and deaths from numerous other animals including humans, not just our little Miniature horses. "
"BTW nitrate toxicity is relatively a low-level toxin to horses when compared to sheep and cattle, due to the different digestive tracts, ruminant's vs monogastrics, meaning it takes a higher level to affect horses than it does cattle or sheep. However, horses are more susceptible to nitrate poisoning than other monogastric animals due to the cecum. Below is a website about pollutants and ground water, where this info above came from."
"I have done quite extensive searches for anything reported or documented, describing any type of birth defects from Nitrate poisoning that mimic DISPROPORTIONATE dwarfism. I have yet to find any. If you have any information describing any credible documentation with pictures or physical descriptions of horses being born with disproportionate dwarf characteristics from nitrate poisoning, I would really appreciate you sending it to me. "
My answer to Minimor's question on Nov 12th, it contains some of my opinion as well about the separation of genetics and environment and its interactions.
"That said, your question IS very valid. Yes, there is a DEFINITE chance that Miniature horses born or raised in the affected areas and are carriers of the dwarf genes can have a dwarf affected by hypothyroidism from Nitrate toxicity and show characteristics of both diseases, one due to environment and one due to genetic inheritance. OF COURSE, THAT CAN HAPPEN. I APPLAUD you for having the resourcefulness to look into those things on your own, and critically examining the situation."
"I have been adamant about my position because not a single person has yet to ask your intelligent question, every one of the questions posed so far have been to blanketly blame nitrates for the dwarfism regardless of the fact that the vast majority of the nitrate toxicity characteristics look nothing like the dwarfisms seen in this breed. One characteristic of one disease does not make it the same disease for something else with the same one characteristic."
"I guess all people with club feet are dwarfs since that is a characteristic of some dwarfisms in humans. That doesn't sound rational to me."
"Dwarfism inheritance and expression is independent of Nitrate toxicity, one can have both and one can have either or. What you would see are the characteristics of both expressed if you have a dwarf with nitrate toxicity and some things will be compounded in severity, BUT Nitrate toxicity in no way will make the dwarf gene show up more often in homozygous form to cause a dwarf. Apples and oranges, recessive diseased gene and environmental toxin. "
"For someone to not have a dwarf since fixing the nitrate problem, they either no longer have the carriers or they are having a great session of Russian Roulette so far, and their number isnt up yet again. The percentages are still there with the same horses to have a dwarf again irregardless of Nitrate toxicity."
Part of my answer to Zacharyfarms's question on "Nitrates Again" that I answered on Nov 12.
"It is starting to sound as if some of you are taking a known toxin and its effects on fetal growth and blanket applying it to any abnormality you see in the Miniatures, genetic or not. I dont get it. I am not saying there are no cases of hypothyroidism in the minis, on the contrary I know it exists, as it does in other horse breeds. And I am not saying that there arent any cases of Nitrate toxicity in Miniatures, on the contrary I am sure it has and will happen, but to blame everything wrong conformationally, congenitally or genetically in the minis on Nitrates is really not thinking things with a rational, critical mind. Are we going to blame all of the dystocias and foaling problems in the Miniatures all over the world on Nitrates too, and ignore their size as probably THE major factor??"
"I know of other toxins, drugs, etc., that can cause similar physical characteristics that are shown on that pdf. I just dont see how you CANNOT distinguish between characteristics of different diseases whether genetic, congenital or environmetally induced. There are differences in their etiology I will not go into here about all three. I would be literally writing a book. "
"I am not belittling this toxin, I just do not see a single glaring similarity other than a slight under bite in one photo, the head is even normal in shape, and it is a large horse foal, not a mini. Dwarfs have numerous other characteristics that do not coincide with nitrate toxicity."
I hope you can read my opinion better with it all in one answer in one thread, and that you read it entirely.
Your articles provided you with some good answers to your own questions as well, below is an article you read and provided.
here is a quote from it.
"In the past, the thyroid gland has been blamed for more than its fair share of problems. But the latest technology and improved blood tests indicate that true thyroid disease in horses is quite rare, and ensuring the right levels of iodine in your horse's diet can prevent most problems."
So, from that alone, if you have a foal born on your farm and it looks suspicious, dwarf or toxin, or thyroid level, there are tests you can have done on your horses and feed and ground, hay, etc. to rule out environment, thyroid, etc. Or if those tests do reveal something, then you might want to re-evaluate your management of your horses. Especially if you have more than one foal born in a year that might or might not be a dwarf. This is not to rule out, like I already wrote above, that you could have both environment and genetics involved at the same time. Those are issues you have to figure out with a knowledgeable vet.
your questions
"The second part is HOW TO TELL THE DIFFERENCE between dwarf foals and foals with environmentally caused (not genetically caused by dwarfism) birth defects. That is ALL I have been asking. I don't know how I can ask this anymore plainly."
"I don't know the numbers, but I would suppose that it is entirely possible that environmental defects account for less than 1% of deformed miniature foals, and that dwarfism is the cause of the other 99+%. However, the percentages are immaterial to my question (although it would be interesting if that number is known), as what I want to know about is my potential foal that isn't 'normal' when it is born. "
"If I have a foal that is born with a domed head, bent legs, and a protruding lower jaw, how can I tell if the foal is a dwarf (genetic condition, unrelated to environment) OR if it has developmental deformities due to environment (not cause by dwarfism)? Please point out the differences so I can understand them.
THAT IS ALL I WANT TO KNOW."
My answers:
I cannot try to explain every variance in expression of genetics and its interaction with the environment by an internet forum. I am not here to diagnose a problem via the internet. That would be blatantly ignoring scientific information pertinent to each individual case seen. Therefore, I cannot give you a list of characteristics that are definitely dwarfism, and a list that are definitely environment, or definitely thyroid. That is not being scientifically sound at all to any of the cases. That is why I am very clear in giving my opinion about a horse that I think is a dwarf. I answer it as my opinion and that IF the horse shows characteristics identical to other dwarf horses I say that it is showing characteristics like the dwarfs I have seen of a certain type. Meaning that a horse I comment on shows characteristics consistent with the very possible inherited genetic disease I am researching. If that is not satisfactory to you, not a problem, you can have your own opinion as well.
There are so many influences in the environment, genes that have not been discovered, and their interactions that are expressed in an individual, etc. Until more is known, I cannot tell you that "such and such horse has a type of congenital dwarfism due to hypothyroid," without having lots of tests done; genetic, blood and environment. Versus that same horse is "100% a dwarf of such and such type and here is the test to prove it". I don't have those answers, you would have to do those things to rule out certain possible causes of your horse's problem with your vet's help and hope someday there is a genetic test for some of these diseases.
You also can't rule out that a foal born is just a badly conformed horse and not a specific type of dwarfism or congenital malformation from a toxin or an out of balance hormone, it is basically undesired genes that are being expressed.
I hope this clears up your questions about my opinions and that I answered you as fully as I could.
John
As a side note;
Why do so many people want to blame something or someone else for their foal with bad conformation and not the quality (or lack of) of their own stock??
Why is it that so many people in the Miniatures dont want to learn BASIC correct horse conformation, and be able to critically examine their own stock and its quality?
Remember this is not a true "breed" that breeds "true". We have a whole lot of undesired genes floating around in our gene pool.
Sorry, My little rant with food for thought.
dominant & recessive genes
Nov. 26 2007
Question
John,
Thank you so much for answering all these questions on the board. It helps us all learn and understand a bit more about dwarfism and I find the topics very interesting.
Here are my 2 questions and Thank you for your time.
Joyce
1.) Do you think that the dominant gene and the recessive gene in horses function the same way as they do in humans?
I was reading that a dominant inheritance in humans can include a form of dwarfism.
2.) Also, which sex of the equine seem to be more effected by the dwarf gene, the fillies or the colts, or do you think that it's about even?
Southern_Heart
Joyce Manual
Southern Heart Ranch -Buena Vista Texas
Answer
Joyce,
1.) Do you think that the dominant gene and the recessive gene in horses function the same way as they do in humans?
I was reading that a dominant inheritance in humans can include a form of dwarfism.
Dominant and recessive genes function the same way in all organisms; plants, animals, invertebrates, bacteria, viruses etc.
Yes, there is a dominant type called ACH in humans, it has been discussed numerous times in some of these threads, one is in the "Response to PM from nightflight" thread.
2.) Also, which sex of the equine seem to be more effected by the dwarf gene, the fillies or the colts, or do you think that it's about even?
Neither are affected more, they are affected the same.
the types of dwarfism I have seen in te Miniatures is NOT sex specific, meaning, the genes are autosomal recessive in their inheritance and non-sex-linked. The same number of fillies as colts would be affected.
John
Response to thread by Candice
Nov. 26 2007
Question
John, Candice posted her pictures here (a couple of links down) after a thread on the other forum. For those of us learning what to look for and because there really seems to be some confusion on what to look for (as some thought this guy was a dwarf) Could you please tell us what you "don't see" in this guy that you would expect to see if he were a dwarf. Thanks.
miniwhinny
Answer
miniwhinney,
I do not have any pics on websites to link to but I know there are numerous sites out there and I am sure someone can link their pics that they have on a website. I believe that what Candice has is a horse with not so good conformation that probably is showing some expressivity of the recessive dwarf gene, i.e. the short neck and slight underbite, I have the opinion that the colt is carrying a recessive dwarf gene, I do not know the pedigree though, but he has other faults that are not characteristics of dwarfism per se alone, if you look at the dam in one of the pics, you can see the conformational similarities in the two that are characteristics that are not dwarf traits. The head is not extreme, the legs are not deformed like I see in dwarfism, the front legs are bad, but I would look at the parents and grandparents.
Without pics of both parents and even sometimes grandparents, you don't see "where" some characteristics are coming from.
John
Raising money for research
Nov. 27 2007
Question
John, I am wondering if you have been able to tap into any organizations for donations for your research?
Do you have any fund raisers at all?
Any donations being taken up at the shows or anything at all for you?
I was thinking that the registries could offer a chance to donate for instance:
When registering a horse, or applying for membership, they could have a little optional part on the applications that say something like "Donate for Dwarfism research" and then they could maybe accept separate checks for your fund.
Just a thought.
Marty
Marty Garrison
Brave Little
Prancers
Miniature Horse Farm - Pikeville, Tennessee
Answer
Marty,
People have tried to get AMHA to have a section in the registration form to donate just a dollar with each registration. Well that never materialized. The Genetics committee did a raffle of a harness a couple of years ago and rasied about 2000 dollars. The donations by breeders either to AMHA or directly has raised approx another 5000. AMHA donated almost 2000 to UK and TAMU each. UK has put up 20,000 so far.
But time and time again I see people saying they want to donate, even your forum has all the info needed on the Best OF section, and there is info here in this forum to donate. I have not recieved one single offer. Since 1993 I alone have spent about 20,000 OF MY OWN MONEY. I am not looking for recognition, I want answers.
I do not have the free time to get people together or make a raffle or fund raise, I am too busy. This site is an ideal site for what you say, the problem is will there actually be people willing to donate money.
John
I have two questions
Nov. 29 2007
Question
What is your hypothesis for your thesis?
Have you seen any correlation between dwarfism and color?
You asked for blood samples several years ago, how long are these samples stable for your test and how long do you hold them?
Teresa Palmer
Kris Marc Farms – Pocahontas, Arkansas
Answer
"What is your hypothesis for your thesis?"
My hypothesis is that there are multiple types of dwarfisms in the Miniature breed. Each of these types are very consistent in characteristics. Each type is showing simple autosomal recessive inheritance so far. Each type is distinct. I am using candidate gene approach of different mammal species that have similar looking diseases and have known genes and mutations.
My first defense is for the most common dwarfism seen. I have labelled it simply as type 1. The reason is depending on what gene is actually involved will help determine the actual name of this type. I have two possible candidate genes, I have multiple samples and families from all pedigree backgrounds. I am trying to see if one of these genes is linked to the type seen. I first have to prove that before I can get support to start sequencing the candidate gene from dwarf samples to try and find the mutation.
"Have you seen any correlation between dwarfism and color?"
There is absolutely NO correlation between color and dwarfism. I have seen dwarfs of every color, and I mean every color.
"You asked for blood samples several years ago, how long are these samples stable for your test and how long do you hold them? "
If you sent me samples I still have the DNA. That is if you sent it to me and not another lab.
When the DNA is isolated from blood and stored in proper media for long term storage at -70 degrees it can last for 50+ YRS AT LEAST. Since DNA really hasnt been isolated since much before 1950's it is hard to really know. And the media they were stored in back then is not as good as the media now. So it could last for 100+ years. We dont know that yet, it hasnt been a 100 yrs yet since DNA has been isolated.
But you cannot store blood frozen and expect the DNA to be stable, it will break down and become worthless. Storing DNA is not storing it in liquid nitrogen like they do for cord blood in humans, it is totally different.
John
Genetic Defects
Nov. 29 2007
Question
I guess I would like to see one more clarification before this closes. A lot of times we have postings about genetic defects on the forum and consistently the reply is must be a dwarf. I know you have addressed this in part while answering other questions but could you, for clarification, cite some common genetic defects or spontaneous mutations that are seen in horses of all breeds and by themselves are not necessarily indicators of dwarfism, but may still be heritable.
Stormy
Answer
"cite some common genetic defects or spontaneous mutations that are seen in horses of all breeds and by themselves are not necessarily indicators of dwarfism, but may still be heritable."
Well for clarification, spontaneous mutations you are probably referring to are probably when a foal is born and it has crooked legs, club footed, or a parrot mouth or monkey mouth, or maybe cow-hocked and neither parent is showing those characteristics, or might be to a degree. Those defects most likely are recessive inferior genes that both the parents are carrying and the foal got both of the genes to express the defect. It was not spontaneous, those things are not known as to how dominant or recessive due to breed variations, but these defects are usually inherited.
Now if you are referring to congenital malformations that occur during development then there is really nothing anyone can do. Those are things that happen spontaneously and are possibly not inheritable, some might be inheritable but as of yet are undetermined, ie, micro-ophthalmia in horses. A good reason why it is still considered just congenital and not inherited yet, is that it is so rare when it happens. I have not read any cases yet where multiple afflicted foals have come from the same mate pairing. Meaning I have not read anything yet where two horses have produced more than 1 afflicted foal. These kinds of spontaneous congenital malformations we can't control.
Any of the defects I listed so far, I would not consider themselves alone characteristics of dwarfism. Just being monkey mouthed does not mean you are a dwarf nor even have a dwarf gene. You most likely have inherited a recessive undesired trait that neither parent is expressing due to them having normal dominant genes showing its trait.
Some traits are structural that someone might confuse with being a dwarf, like short legs that are proportional, meaning upper and lower leg bones are proportional to themselves, but you have a horse that is really long bodied, big head, and short neck. Well to me, most likely you have just a horse with undesirable traits, not dwarfism at all. Those things happen, we are breeding animals with genetics we cannot totally control, we are not manufacturing an idealized horse from an assembly line.
There are too many defects, whether inherited or congenital to list out that have nothing to do with dwarfism. A good large horse conformation and breeding book will be able to give good detail and pictures that are inferior traits that have nothing to do with dwarfism themselves alone.
Maybe more breeders should take a hard look in the mirror at yourself and see what is not "ideal" in the human's eyes.
Then take a look at the breeding (mating) decisions you made and take a hard look at the results. Now, how many of the resulting foals look like what you "wanted" to have, or thought you would have. After really being critical and if you got higher than 50% you are doing good.
Remember, Mother Nature wants genetic variation, this ensures the most viable genetics are spread out to ensure the perpetuation of a species, and organisms in general, plant or whatever. The way genes are inherited ensures some variation no matter how true breeding an animal is.
John
Bloodlines
Nov. 30 2007
Question
What bloodlines should we be concerned about for the dwarfs. Do any of the Fallabella bloodlines or the popular names like Bond or Brewer have any dwarfs in them. I have a lot of Bond and Komoko and I am concerned about that because so many of my horses seem to be related to one another in a way. I just am hopeful that someday we can have a list of the bloodlines that have dwarfs in them just so we can know.
Shadowsmystictopaz
Sue & Dave Weinert
Diamond W Ranch – California
Andrea Weinert idea maker
Answer
Your question was asked earlier in the forum when it
started. I will say again, I cannot give out pedigree info
that I am using in my research. It would be me publicly
saying "such and such" stallion or "such and such " farm has
produced a certain number of dwarfs and without scientific
proof it could ruin a stallion or bloodline or farm just on
here say. I don't think people would appreciate it,
especially if it was your stallion or breeding program.
In general, I will say like I said in the other answer, these dwarfisms are extremely intertwined within the WHOLE breeding population. My dwarf samples have pedigrees and backgrounds of every well-known pedigree in the world. It is not wise to get hung up on "bloodlines"; many carriers have extensive old bloodlines that are intertwined, and the same is so for the non-carriers, you will not know which are carriers and which are not until you have a dwarf.
We are NEVER going to know the original culprits, so get over that thought, go from here and learn what actual horses have produced dwarfs.
John
Non-dwarf question
Nov. 30 2007
Question
I know it is a non-dwarf question, and maybe you cannot
answer it, but I have always wondered what the connection is
between coat color and the
gi
tract in horses? To clarify, why do lethal white foals die
due to issues in the intestine? Are these gene's loci on the
same chromosome?
I've just always wondered.
ckmini
CK Miniatures and CK Performance Horses - Montana
Answer
Here is the NCBI link that briefly explains the answer to
your question, and gives links to other research papers that
are about the disease and the color link.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=omia&cmd=search&term=lethal%20white%20overo 2012 UPDATE BY ADMIN The long-provided link now goes to a not found page. Please go to: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ and in the provided search box type in: “ lethal white overo “ for several wonderful articles on this topic.
If it does not go to NCBI let me know.
The mutation in the gene that causes the lack of coat color migration (i.e. pigmentation) is also responsible for nerve cell development of the neural crest stem cells. It is a little complicated to try and explain all of this in embryonic development terms without using diagrams and a lot of typing so you might want to google embryo development stages and you will probably be able to find really good pics.
John
So, what can we do?
Nov. 30 2007
Question
So, what can we, as breeders, do now, in your opinion and
until we have more information or testing, to try and breed
better horses and lessen the chance of dwarfism?
MiLo
Minis
Lori Rafter
Maple Mountain Miniatures - Ontario Canada
Answer
Learn all you can about good horse conformation, from large
horse books. Genetics and breeding reference books. Online
book stores look for equine breeding management or genetics.
There are a lot out there. Then pay attention to as much as
possible the dwarfs out there you
se,
either in person, or on the internet, try to find out as
much as possible through first hand info on pedigrees, not,
someone heard that such and such stallion had a dwarf or a
bunch of dwarfs, when you see them find out pedigree info if
possible. Remember what I wrote about how pervasive these
dwarfisms are in the breed. Do not get hung up on a certain
head type or other individual traits that most likely are
not the recessive gene having expressivity. There are a lot
of non-desired traits within our breed. We are not a "true"
breeding "breed", we can get anything under the rainbow.
John
Bond Tiny Tim?
Nov. 30 2007
Question
We all know that Bond Tiny Tim was a dwarf. How far back in
the pedigree does he have to be before you don't worry so
much? I have a Bond Dynamo son out of an Orion daughter and
he has never produced a dwarf for me and can only assume he
didn't for his previous owner.
Thank You,
Robin1
Robin
Phoenix, Arizona
Answer
It does not matter anymore. Can you stand up and say 100%
that every bit of all of your horse's pedigrees are true and
accurate to the founding generations???, if they even go
back seven or eight generations. There were many things done
years ago, I trust newer pedigrees with DNA and PQ on them
that they are accurate for the recent generations but I
really do not take much from old pedigrees in the sense that
they are all 100% accurate. I use that as "general" info
when I do pedigree work on my samples as possible ties but I
cannot use that as true and accurate info to base any
opinions on. Again, individual horses that are non-carriers
can easily exist from pedigrees of known dwarfs. 25% of all
the foals born to two carriers of a specific type will be
genetically normal and never produce a dwarf of the same
type, because that 25% did not inherit the defective gene
from either parent.
John
What about the dwarfs that are born?
Nov. 30 2007
Question
This might be a dumb question?
With your research, is there anything that might help the
dwarfs grow after birthing?
Just wondering?
Reble
Mary
Kavelman
Kavelbel
Miniatures - Ontario Canada
Answer
No.
There is nothing that humans can do to help the human dwarfs grow to normal size except surgery on a select few bones in a select few types of dwarfism in humans, (ie ACH dwarfism and the surgery to lengthen the long bones of the legs and arms). There is nothing that can help the horses, I really do not think Science or anyone's bank account is interested in that expensive and experimental endeavor with the horses either.
The diseases cause the bones to grow abnormally or not develop at all in to normal functional bones. Therefore, you can't change the genes and how they have been mutated and are encoded to produce proteins that are abnormal. Gene therapy is something that in other diseases is a sci -fi endeavor right now. I do not know if it will ever be possible for that in human dwarfisms let alone horses.
John
One Final Question from me,
Nov. 30 2007
Question
I also have one final question that I have often wondered
about. Have you at all found during your studies that horses
with a very high
tailset
will often throw dwarf foals? I guess what I am asking, is
would/could or has this proven it can be a sign of
(carrying) dwarfism? I have heard of various dwarf signs to
watch for, but had not heard of that one, and it has just
been a personal observation of mine where I have often seen
dwarfs, and one parent had the extremely high
tailset,
so always wondered if perhaps there was something more to
it, as in it may be an expression of a horse carrying the
dwarfism gene? Thank you.
Mona
Mona Stone
Last Chance Miniatures - Ontario, Canada
Answer
Mona,
Sorry but no. You are seeing way more into this than is there with regards to specific conformational characteristics. That would be similar to me saying that many small eared horses that I have seen have produced dwarfs. There is no way to prove that whatsoever. I do not know of a normal conformational characteristic that has anything close to being associated with dwarfism. A high tail set or low tail set, it doesn't matter each one could be a carrier or not be a carrier. I can show you pictures of both, carriers or non that have both types of tail sets and every degree in between.
As a side note, think about the question you asked. If only one parent of a dwarf had a high tail set and the other did not, why would you associate dwarfism and a high tail set. BOTH parents would need to have a high tail set to be showing signs that it is associated because BOTH parents contribute a recessive diseased gene to the dwarf. If only one parent, you say, has a high tail set of two parents that have had a dwarf, then that alone blows your theory out of the water.
John
question on signs and pedigree -
Nov. 30 2007
Question
May I send you links to a mare and two stallions with pictures and pedigrees? One combination produced a dwarf and the other did not. I can't post here who they are because I don't own the stallions.
Thanks
yankee_minis
Tracy Palmer
Bito-O-Blue Miniature Horses - Maine
Answer
Yes
just email by PM or email me to arionmgmt@aol.com.
John
John Eberth
B.A. in Biology, minor in biochemistry
currently working on his M.S. and PhD in Equine Genetics (concurrently) at the
University of Kentucky Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center
He is now concentrating on his thesis defense of "Dwarfism in the Miniature Horse"
Owner of Arion Management Inc.
showing, breeding and managing Miniatures for over 28 yrs. with numerous World
and National titles.
Licensed AMHA judge and currently working on his AMHR and ASPC cards
NOTE:
This Transcript Is Property of Lil Beginnings Miniature Horses
and is not to be copied, edited, or distributed without written
permission.
Please
email
me if you’d like to request permission to link to this article.
Thank you.
Do you
have a topic you would like to see here or article you'd like to submit?
Please
E-mail me
We wish to thank all of the people that have shared their experiences &
knowledge with others by sending us tips and donating articles. For articles on
our pages that have been reproduced, credit is given and a link is posted to
your site (reproducing articles archives information on our server which
decreases broken links that occur when content on the site was either removed or
relocated without proper redirects in place to lead visitors to the correct
page.)
Please forgive us if we did not give full credit for any one of the wonderful articles
here. If we have used something of yours
that you would like removed please let me know.
All rights reserved. No part of any pages may be reproduced in any form or
means without written permission of Lil Beginnings Miniature Horses.
Lil Beginnings Miniature Horses is not responsible for any death, injuries, loss, or other damages which may result from the use of the information in
our pages.